{"data":[{"id":"10.17916/p6js3g","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p6js3g","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"Suárez Rozo, Luisa F.","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Luisa F.","familyName":"Suárez Rozo","affiliation":["Lund Science (Sweden)"],"nameIdentifiers":[{"schemeUri":"https://orcid.org","nameIdentifier":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-895X","nameIdentifierScheme":"ORCID"}]},{"name":"Nicholas, Kimberly","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Kimberly","familyName":"Nicholas","affiliation":["Lund University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]}],"titles":[{"title":"Metadata for a survey investigating motivations for meat-free diets in Sweden"}],"publisher":"Dryad","container":{},"publicationYear":2019,"subjects":[{"subject":"Sustainable food choices"}],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2019-06-10T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Issued"},{"date":"2019-06-10T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Available"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["75815 bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"1","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","rightsIdentifier":"cc-by-4.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"The health and environmental impacts of meat-based diets are increasingly\n recognized as sustainability issues, but the motivations behind behaviour\n change driving vegetarian diets have generally been studied via a limited\n set of motivations and are therefore poorly understood. To examine such\n motivations, we designed a survey measuring 20 different possible\n motivations, using 77 statements drawn from the existing Food Choice\n Questionnaire as well as diverse literature on environmental protection,\n animal welfare, social norms, and pro-environmental behaviour. We\n administered the survey to 121 vegetarians in Skåne, Sweden.   We\n found that animal welfare was by far the most important overall motivation\n for vegetarian diets (mean rating 4.29 on a 5-point scale), followed by\n intrinsic motivation (3.0), reduced consumption (2.69), environmental\n concern (2.65) and health (2.59). The least important motivations (ratings\n under 2.0) were sociability, social image, weight control, mood, and\n convenience. The most highly rated individual statements (ratings above\n 4.0) were protecting animal rights and avoiding causing animals pain, and\n a sense of integrity in living up to one’s values. We conclude that\n vegetarians are primarily motivated by valuing animals as well as personal\n integrity and enjoyment derived from vegetarian food, and that promoting\n vegetarian diets might therefore be more successful if focused on aligning\n consumer’s internal values and satisfaction with their behaviour, rather\n than emphasizing concerns for the environment or health. Understanding\n values of non-vegetarians would also be important to designing effective\n dietary strategies to promote more sustainable diets.","descriptionType":"Abstract"},{"description":"To assess the range of food choice motivations among vegetarians\n and vegans in Skåne (Sweden), we used an online questionnaire through\n surveygizmo.com, collecting data between April 4 and 18, 2014.  \n The dataset was processed using SPSS, conducting descriptive\n statistical analysis to determine the mean of each individual statemente\n on a scale of 1 (Not at all important) to 5 (Extremely important). By\n averaging the  mean scores of every statement within each motivation\n scale, we then determined the importance of each motivation scale in\n explaining respondent´s adoption of meat- free diets. We also used t-tests\n to assess the effect of various demographic charactersitics on each\n motivation scale, and whether the different effects where statistically\n significant.  We then interpreted the findings derived\n from this information, in the light of Self-Determination Theory, a useful\n qualitative framework to understand if the studied motivations are\n autonomous or controlled.   ","descriptionType":"Methods"}],"geoLocations":[{"geoLocationBox":{"eastBoundLongitude":14.584478,"northBoundLatitude":56.542606,"southBoundLatitude":55.335377,"westBoundLongitude":12.441755},"geoLocationPlace":"Provincia de Escania, Suecia","geoLocationPoint":{"pointLatitude":55.990257,"pointLongitude":13.595769}}],"fundingReferences":[{"schemeUri":"https://ror.org","awardTitle":"Publication fees","funderName":"Swedish Research Council","awardNumber":"2014-5899/E0589901","funderIdentifier":"https://ror.org/03zttf063","funderIdentifierType":"ROR"},{"schemeUri":"https://ror.org","awardTitle":"\n        Study costs for Luisa F. Suárez Rozo for the International MSc Programme\n        in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science (Lund University)\n      ","funderName":"Swedish Institute","awardNumber":"04678/2012","funderIdentifier":"https://ror.org/022w3f533","funderIdentifierType":"ROR"}],"url":"https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.17916/P6JS3G","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":19,"schemaVersion":"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4","source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":285,"downloadCount":37,"referenceCount":0,"citationCount":0,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2018-12-13T20:27:48Z","registered":"2018-12-13T20:27:50Z","published":null,"updated":"2026-03-11T13:03:51Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"dryad.dryad","type":"clients"}}}},{"id":"10.17916/p68c7c","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p68c7c","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"Ershov, Bogdan","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Bogdan","familyName":"Ershov","affiliation":["Voronezh State Technical University"],"nameIdentifiers":[{"schemeUri":"https://orcid.org","nameIdentifier":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-0350","nameIdentifierScheme":"ORCID"}]},{"name":"Lubkin, Yanis","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Yanis","familyName":"Lubkin","affiliation":["Voronezh State Technical University"],"nameIdentifiers":[{"schemeUri":"https://orcid.org","nameIdentifier":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-0350","nameIdentifierScheme":"ORCID"}]}],"titles":[{"title":"MISSIONARY ACTIVITY OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH IN RUSSIA"}],"publisher":"Dryad","container":{},"publicationYear":2021,"subjects":[{"subject":"missionary"},{"subject":"orthodoxy"},{"subject":"priest"},{"subject":"state."}],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2021-02-28T22:31:02Z","dateType":"Submitted"},{"date":"2019-03-19T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Issued"},{"date":"2019-03-19T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Available"},{"date":"2021-03-22T00:00:00Z","dateType":"Updated"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"14","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","rightsIdentifier":"cc-by-4.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"The article discusses the missionary activities of the Orthodox Church in\n Russia. It has been revealed that the Christianization of the non-Russian\n peoples of Russia was a complex and controversial problem, since\n missionary activity affected the most important, defining aspects of the\n ethnos life, such as ideology, traditions, customs and way of life.\n Special attention is paid to the enlightenment of the Orthodox faith of\n many peoples of Siberia, who were representatives of various religious\n beliefs: paganism, Islam, Buddhism. To work with them, the Church\n developed a set of measures that contributed to the conversion of these\n peoples to Orthodoxy.  ","descriptionType":"Abstract"},{"description":"When writing an article,\n the authors were guided by the principles of historicism, science and\n objectivity. In solving research problems, both general scientific methods\n (analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, abstraction,\n concretization, idealization, generalization) and traditional methods of\n historical analysis (historical-genetic, historical-typological,\n comparative-historical, historical-functional). When collecting materials,\n the main role was played by the method of archival research.","descriptionType":"Methods"},{"description":"\u003cstrong\u003eI.\n INTRODUCTION\u003c/strong\u003e Religious education and missionary activities have\n become an important activity of the modern Orthodox Church. The goal of\n the Church, according to numerous statements by Orthodox hierarchs, is the\n moral education of believers, their acquaintance with a rich religious and\n cultural heritage. In addition, new religious (or pseudo-religious)\n antisocial or extremist movements are prohibited. At the same time, however, the\n active implementation of Orthodox programs in the system of education,\n health, social security, in the army sometimes causes rejection by\n representatives of other faiths or non-believers. It is obvious that the\n activities of the religious, educational and missionary work of the\n Russian Orthodox Church in modern conditions should go without violating\n the rights of non-Orthodox citizens of the Russian Federation.\n \u003cbr\u003e\n \u003cstrong\u003eII. DISCUSSION\u003c/strong\u003e In the last quarter of the 20th\n century, with a revival of interest in the Orthodox Church, as an\n important component of the history of the Russian state, scholarly works\n began to appear on its missionary activity.\u003cbr\u003e In the works of N.\n Yu. Khrapov “The place and role of the Altai spiritual mission in the\n process of colonization and economic development of Gorny Altai,\n 1828-1905” by W. Vanin on the topic: “The missionary activity of the\n Russian Orthodox Church in Northeast Asia from the Middle XVIII - the\n middle of the XIX century Razdolsky \"Missionary activity of the\n Orthodox Church in the North Caucasus in the XIX - early XX\n centuries.\". Ipatiev in his book \"Missionary activity of the\n Russian Orthodox Church in the south of the Far East in the 19th - early\n 20th centuries\" emphasizes the positive role of elements of the\n missionary activity of the Church in the development of the social and\n political life of the peoples of these regions. In the last years of the\n 20th century The Orthodox Church in such a multi-ethnic and\n multi-religious region as the Urals. In 1996, the international\n scientific-practical conference \"Christian Missionary as a Phenomenon\n of History and Culture\" was held in the central city of the Western\n Urals, dedicated to the 600th anniversary of the memory of the famous\n missionary and enlightener of Komi Stefan Velikopermsky. In the reports of\n scientists from Perm, Yekaterinburg and Moscow: N.A. Minenko, Chagina K.B.\n Kuzmina A.B. Chernykh, E.G. Glavatskoy, A. Marchenko, Semenov and\n discussed in detail the history of the Christianization of the Urals in\n the XV - XX centuries. Missionary activities of the church in the period\n 1905-1916. analyzed in the work of the church historian MG Nechaev. This\n author comprehensively investigated the missionary system not only in the\n “external” mission, aimed at attracting “foreigners” to Orthodoxy, but\n also in the “internal” mission, the object of which was Old Believers,\n sectarians, representatives of non-Orthodox: Catholics and Protestants.\n Nevertheless, the strengthening of missionary activity at the stage of\n 1908-1914 is noted. through the involvement of ecclesiastical\n organizations: sober societies, fraternities, and circles of pious\n devotees. The\n overall outcome of the conference was the identification of the positive\n contribution of Orthodox missionaries to education and familiarizing\n Russian civilization with non-Russian peoples living in this territory:\n Udmurts, Mari, Komi, Perm, Khanty and Mansi, an active position of the\n Church in the public life of Russia.\u003cbr\u003e A review of the\n historiography on this issue reveals the existence of a relatively small\n number of special studies of secular historians on the missionary\n activities of the Russian Orthodox Church. Only in the last quarter of the\n 20th century, studies of Orthodox missionary work began to appear in\n different regions of Russia. However, to date, not a single special work\n on the history of the church has been published, devoted to Orthodox\n missionary work in the first third of the 20th century, in the period that\n is the boundary between the new and modern history of Russia.\u003cbr\u003e\n   \u003cstrong\u003eIII. RESULTS\u003c/strong\u003e\n The idea of missionary\n work was one of the main ones in Christianity; the local clergy continued\n their diligent educational work among the pagans. Thanks to parish\n priests, there were frequent cases of the baptism of pagans.\u003cbr\u003e The\n principle of tolerance was proclaimed in Russia, and at the same time\n there was a process of strengthening administrative and religious measures\n to involve \"foreigners\" in the Orthodox faith. This was\n expressed in the creation of instructions, rules that established the\n procedure for preparing pagans for the adoption of the Orthodox\n faith.\u003cbr\u003e The main activities of the missions were conversion to\n Orthodoxy, the approval of new converts in the faith and their education.\n The brotherhood that existed in the missions expanded their fields of\n activity, such as health care, charity and research. Each mission had its own\n characteristics. The missionaries used various methods in their\n activities, such as conversation, preaching, and worship. For meetings\n with the indigenous population, they traveled to places of nomadism, in\n the summer by boat, in the winter by deer. The missionaries tried to take\n into account the psychology of the indigenous population, for example,\n used pictures from the New Testament during conversations. The teaching method is\n widespread. Several schools were created for Aboriginal children, and\n after graduation, some graduates continued their studies in secondary\n schools. Pursuing enlightenment, the missionaries hoped that the children\n would become agents of the ideas of Christianity, but in general this was\n not achieved. Missionaries translated books into Aboriginal languages,\n which largely contributed to the emergence of national writing. In\n addition to liturgical literature, they created the alphabet,\n dictionaries. The first museum and libraries were created, the children of\n the Russian population studied in schools with the children of the\n aborigines. Cultural and educational activities of missionaries\n contributed to raising the educational level of the entire population of\n Russia.\u003cbr\u003e Activity in missions, the appearance of positive results\n in the circulation and approval of new nations depended to a large extent\n on the personality of the missionary. There are several names of\n missionaries who worked in the XIX - early XX centuries. in Northwestern\n Siberia and who made the greatest contribution to the development of\n missionary work. This is Archimandrite Arseny, rector of the Kondinsky\n Monastery; Archpriest Peter Popov, who served in the Obdorsk mission;\n Igumen Averky, head of the Obdorsk mission, previously served in the\n Kondinsky monastery; member of Obdorsk mission, teacher, translator I.\n Egorov. Hegumen Irinarkh, rector of the Obdorsk mission, who was called\n the educator of the North, is especially worth noting. He earned the\n respect and gratitude of not only his contemporaries, but of all\n subsequent generations of the inhabitants of Obdorsk North. As a result of\n the missionary activities of the Russian Orthodox Church in North-Western\n Siberia in the XIX - early XX centuries. It was possible to convert the\n Ugrians, Selkup, part of Obdorsk Khanty and Nenets to Christianity. In our\n opinion, the number of converts to Orthodoxy is a formal result that\n cannot serve as an indicator of the success or failure of\n missionaries. The real result was as follows: at the beginning of the\n 20th century, most of the baptized Khanty, Mansi, Nenets, Selkup were\n Christians “by name only”. Christianity influenced the religious beliefs\n and traditional rituals of Aboriginal people in North-Western Siberia. In\n the process of the penetration of Orthodoxy, religious syncretism or dual\n faith developed. Elements of Christianity manifested themselves in the\n external attributes of the cult, in the inner, spiritual world of the\n indigenous population. In many Aboriginal groups, baptismal, wedding, and\n funeral rites appeared. In general, the Aboriginal family ritual has\n retained its traditional features.\u003cbr\u003e Missionaries sought reasons\n for the failure to spread Orthodoxy among Aboriginal people due to lack of\n financial support from the state, the lack of a permanent policy of\n spiritual authority on the ground, the lack of missionary personnel, a\n lack of knowledge of indigenous languages, a weak missionary initiative,\n etc. We believe\n that the reasons for the low efficiency of the missionary activities of\n the Russian Orthodox Church among the Khanty, Mansi, Nenets and Selkup\n groups were that their traditional beliefs corresponded optimally to their\n way of life.   \u003cstrong\u003eIV. CONCLUSION\u003c/strong\u003e\n Thus, the various\n historical periods of the missionary work of the Russian Church were\n characterized by the strengthening of the integration function of the\n missionary activity of the Church, the high degree of activity of the\n Orthodox population in religious, educational, social, charitable\n activities of all faiths in Russia. All these factors indicate an increase\n in the real status of the Russian Orthodox Church in Russian\n society. \u003cbr\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eREFERENCE\n LIST\u003c/strong\u003e Ashmarov I.A., Ershov B.A. (2018) Church as a social and\n economic institution of society in the XIX - early XX centuries. II\n International Scientific and Practical Conference \"Orthodoxy and\n Society: the Edge of Interaction.\" Chita: Transbaikal State\n University. Pp. 33-41. (in Russian). Ashmarov, I.A., Ershov, B.A.,\n Bulavin, R.V., Shkarubo, S.N., Danilchenko, S. (2018) The Material And\n Financial Situation Of The Russian Orthodox Church In The XIX - early XX\n centuries.  International Multidisciplinary Conference on Industrial\n Engineering and Modern Technologies “Far East Con” - 2018.\n https://www.dvfu.ru/schools/engineering/far_east_con/ (in\n English). Ershov\n B. A., Ashmarov A. I., Drobyshev V. A., Zhdanova TA, Buravlev A. I. (2017)\n Property and Land Relations of Russian Orthodox Church and State in Russia\n The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences Pp. 324-331.\n (in Russian). Ershov B.A. (2012) State legal regulation of the\n activities of the Russian Orthodox Church in the provinces of the Central\n Chernozem region in the XIX -early XX centuries Historical, philosophical,\n political and legal sciences, culturology and arthistory. Questions of\n theory and practice №. 4. Pp. 75-78. (in Russian). Ershov B.A. Ashmarov I.A.,\n (2018) Interaction of the Orthodox Church and the state in Russia at the\n present stage.. Journal \"Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian\n Research\". № 2. Pp. 19-24. URL:\n http://bulletensocial.com/index.php/archive.html (in English).\n Ershov B.A., Ashmarov I.A.\n (2018) Interaction of the Orthodox Church and the State in Russia at the\n Present Stage Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research. № 2. Pp.\n 19-24. (in Russian). Ershov, B.A. (2013) Russian Orthodox Church in the\n structure of public administration in the XIX -early XX centuries:\n Monograph Voronezh State Technical University. 245 p. (in\n Russian). Ershov, B.A., Ashmarov, I.A., Danilchenko, S. (2018) The\n development of Russian church architecture in the 1990s-2017: the state\n and prospects. Publisher: DataONE. https://doi.org/10.15146/R3FQ16 (in\n English).\u003cbr\u003e Fedorov V.A. (2003) Russian Orthodox Church and State.\n Synodal period. 1700-1917. M. 280 p. (in Russian). Freeze G.L. (1983) The Parish\n Clergy in Nineteenth-Century Russia. Crisis, Refrm, Counter-Reform.\n Princeton. 412 p. (in English). Gromov M.N., Kozlov KS. (1990) Russian philosophical\n thought X-XVII centuries. Publishing House Mosk. state un-that. 286 p. (in\n Russian). Krasnikov N.P. (1968) In pursuit of a century. M. 160 p.\n (in Russian). Leontyeva T.G. (2002) Faith and progress: the Orthodox\n rural clergy of Russia in the second half of the nineteenth and early\n twentieth centuries. M. 258 p. (in Russian). Missionary activity of the\n Kondinsky women's community (1897). Tobolsk diocesan statements. №\n 11. Pp. 179-180. (in Russian). Nikolsky N.M. (1988) History of the Russian Church. M.\n 320 p. (in Russian). Ostrovsky A.B. (2002) Forms of public recognition of the\n Old Believers after the adoption of the decrees of 1905-1906, which\n legitimized toleration. Old Believers: history, culture, modernity. Pp.\n 163-173. (in Russian). Runkevich S.G. (1900) History of the Russian Church\n under the administration of the Holy Government Synod. SPb. 424 p. (in\n Russian). Oswalt\n U. (1993) The clergy and parish life reform. 1861-1865. Voprosy istorii.\n №. 11-12. (in Russian). Preobrazhensky I.K. (1903) On the question of the causes\n of \"discouragement\" in our clergy. Missionary Review. № 8. Pp.\n 1171-1181. (in Russian). Report of the Diocesan Observer on the state of the\n church schools of the Kursk diocese for 1914-1915 (1916). 62 p. (in\n Russian). Rimskii C.B. (1999) Russian Church in the era of great\n reforms. M. 612 p. (in Russian). Vasily Biryukov (1907) The state of Orthodox missionary\n work in Western Siberia after Metropolitan Philotheos (Leshchinsky) until\n the beginning of the 19th century. Orthodox evangelist. № 3. Pp. 107-115.\n (in Russian). Voronetz  E. K. (1891) On the question of the state\n statement of Orthodox missions in Orthodox Russia (Open letter to the\n former Mentor). Wanderer. №. 6-7. Pp. 260-302. (in Russian).\n Zubarev, E. (1910)\n Cheating and Heresy as the Beginning of Belokrinitsky Old Belief.\n Missionary Review. № 11. Pp. 1399-1401. (in Russian).  ","descriptionType":"Other"}],"geoLocations":[],"fundingReferences":[],"url":"https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.17916/P68C7C","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":33,"schemaVersion":"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4","source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":328,"downloadCount":21,"referenceCount":1,"citationCount":1,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2019-03-19T10:21:21Z","registered":"2019-03-19T10:21:22Z","published":null,"updated":"2026-01-27T18:43:37Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"dryad.dryad","type":"clients"}}}},{"id":"10.17916/p6v880","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p6v880","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"Drobyshev, Aleksey","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Aleksey","familyName":"Drobyshev","affiliation":["Voronezh State Pedagogical University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]}],"titles":[{"title":"CHARITY OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH DURING THE RUSSO-TURKISH WAR (1877-1878)"}],"publisher":"Dryad","container":{},"publicationYear":2021,"subjects":[{"subject":"army."},{"subject":"charity"},{"subject":"clergy"},{"subject":"Russian Orthodox Church"},{"subject":"Russo-Turkish War"}],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2021-02-28T22:45:02Z","dateType":"Submitted"},{"date":"2018-11-19T08:00:00Z","dateType":"Issued"},{"date":"2018-11-19T08:00:00Z","dateType":"Available"},{"date":"2021-03-22T00:00:00Z","dateType":"Updated"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"11","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","rightsIdentifier":"cc-by-4.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"  The article is devoted to the study of the charitable\n activities of the Russian Orthodox Church during the Russian-Turkish war\n (1877-1878). During the war years, the Church always took an active part\n in protecting the state from enemies. Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878 is\n one of the most significant examples of such interaction. It should be\n noted that this military campaign was of particular importance for the\n Russian Orthodox Church, since its goal was to liberate the Orthodox\n peoples of the Balkan Peninsula from the power of the Ottoman Empire. For\n many years, Russian clergymen maintained contact with the Balkan clergy,\n providing them all possible assistance. During the Russo-Turkish war the\n Church’s charitable activities have reached unprecedented proportions.\n Such activities began before the outbreak of war. The church hierarchs\n contributed to the creation of sisters of mercy organizations capable of\n working in military conditions. During the military campaign period, the\n Russian clergy launched active efforts to organize assistance to the\n active army and wounded soldiers. During the sermons, the priests urged\n the congregation to actively donate money and things. Representatives of\n the Church themselves also made a significant contribution for this\n purpose. A special role was played by the provincial, primarily the rural\n clergy, since the bulk of the population of the empire at that time were\n peasants. In our opinion, the Russian Orthodox Church made a very\n significant contribution to the organization and implementation of\n charitable activities during the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878. This\n greatly helped the soldiers, and also assisted the families of those\n killed in the war.  ","descriptionType":"Abstract"},{"description":"The article\n is based on a systematic approach. Its usage in considering the problem\n allowed the author to research the interrelation of general trends in the\n relations between the Church and the army in the sphere of\n charity. Also the principles of historicism and complexity have been\n used. Based on the principle of historicism, the author comprehensively\n evaluated the facts and documents of the past taking into account the\n specific features of the studied period. Following the principle of\n complexity, it was possible to obtain scientific knowledge about the\n general trends in the development of the Church charitable activity on the\n basis of a variety of identified sources and scientific works.","descriptionType":"Methods"},{"description":"  \u003cstrong\u003e I. INTRODUCTION\u003c/strong\u003e\n The XIX century is one of\n the most important periods in the history of the development of relations\n between the Church, state, and military force in the Russian Empire. The\n alliance of the Russian army and the Church was severely tested during\n major military campaigns. Such interaction was carried out not only at the\n national, but also at the regional level.\u003cbr\u003e The article studies\n the Russian Orthodox Church charitable activity during one of the most\n significant military campaigns in the XIX century Russian history. In\n wartime, the Church has always been actively involved in helping those in\n need. Charity during the Russo-Turkish war (1877-1878) reached\n extraordinary proportions. Donations were received from ordinary people,\n monasteries and the highest Church hierarchy.     \u003cstrong\u003eII.\n DISCUSSION\u003c/strong\u003e Such an important aspect of the activity of the Orthodox\n Church, especially significant during the period of hostilities, as\n charity, began to be studied in the XIX century. This issue was\n researched, in particular, by Russian religious philosophers. N.A.\n Berdyaev believed that the basis of true Orthodox spirituality should be\n based not only on the desire for personal salvation, but also on\n participation in social transformations, since, according to the\n philosopher, social life depends entirely on the spiritual qualities of\n people.\u003cbr\u003e Among the representatives of the secular\n pre-revolutionary historiography, was V.O. Klyuchevsky. In his opinion,\n charity in Russia was not so much a means of improving public\n beautification as a necessary condition for improving moral\n health.\u003cbr\u003e Modern researchers also pay attention to some issues\n related to the charitable activities of clergy. The article of V.M.\n Moskvina is devoted to the study of the role of the clergy in cultural and\n educational work among military personnel. In the paper of B.A. Ershov,\n “Sisters of Charity Communities and the Orthodox Church of the Russian\n Province of the XIXth Century,” the role of the Church in creating and\n organizing the activities of provincial sisters of charity communities\n that participated in military campaigns is studied. The article written by\n S.V. Arkhipov examines the charitable activities of the Church during the\n Russian-Turkish war of 1877-1878, regarding the organization of assistance\n to the Slavic peoples of the Balkan Peninsula and the wounded Russian\n soldiers.\u003cbr\u003e However, issues related to the charity of the Russian\n Orthodox Church during the Russian-Turkish war have not been studied in\n sufficient detail. \u003cbr\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e  III.\n RESULTS\u003c/strong\u003e The charitable activities of the Church started on the\n eve of the military campaign. The Synod (the highest governing body of the\n Russian Orthodox Church between 1721 and 1918)  issued a decree of\n November 24, 1876, required all female monasteries and communities to form\n \"compassionate sisters\" groups consisting of nuns and novices\n for working in military hospitals. The same monasteries were ordered to\n engage in the manufacture of lint, bandages, dressings, and all that was\n required for the wounds treatment. According to the decree of March 3,\n 1877, men's monasteries were also involved in the formation of\n \"compassionate brothers\" groups of monks and novices who were\n able to do the same work. And immediately after the declaration of war,\n the Holy Synod published the required number of copies of the war\n declaring manifest and sent them to the dioceses with the instruction to\n read the manifest in cathedrals, churches and monasteries. The members of\n the Holy Synod, the clergy and the laity called for donations for the army\n needs. Since the autumn of 1877, taking into account the upcoming cold\n weather conditions, the ongoing military operations and a substantial\n increase in the costs of war, the Synod urged monasteries and hermitages\n along the railways to provide all available and reserve room for arranging\n hospitals for convalescent or sick soldiers, having made all the necessary\n materials for them.\u003cbr\u003e Collecting donations for military purposes\n was a sphere of activity of two organizations: The Slavic Benevolent\n Society, also known as the Slavic Committee, and the Society for the care\n of sick and wounded soldiers, which was renamed the Red Cross Society soon\n after the war. Slavic Benevolent Society was founded in Moscow in 1858,\n then opened two branches - in St. Petersburg and Kiev. The Society for\n care the sick and wounded soldiers, founded in 1867, had its own\n warehouses to store humanitarian aid in the large cities of the Russian\n Empire.\u003cbr\u003e Like during the Crimean War, women's organizations\n played a large role in charitable activities.\u003cbr\u003e All communities of\n this type can be divided into 3 groups: 1) communities realizing a wide\n charity activities, including the poor and orphans support; 2)\n communities, whose main activity was to help sick and wounded soldiers\n (these communities closely co-operated with the Ladies' Committee\n caring wounded and sick soldiers); 3) communities that existed at the\n convents and under the jurisdiction of the Holy Synod (these communities\n were often involved in extensive charity work and worked on monastic\n principles).\u003cbr\u003e Along with the belonging to a particular community\n sisters of charity, for whom the care of the sick and wounded was a\n professional affair, there were Red Cross sisters who were trained for the\n case of hostilities. In fact, the Red Cross nurses were the women ready to\n abandon their everyday life during the war in order to serve the sick and\n wounded. There were lots of such not only in the capital, but in\n provincial cities too.\u003cbr\u003e Legal and administrative provisions of\n the Sisters of Charity during the war were regulated by published in 1875\n \"Rules for the Sisters of the Red Cross,\" and the rules drawn up\n for those wishing to join the Red Cross sisters only during the war.\n Accordingly, the status of permanently working in communities sisters and\n those who would like to perform the duties temporarily (popularly called\n \"volunteers\" or \"civilians\") had been\n delineated.\u003cbr\u003e Participation in the Orthodox religion for the\n sisters of the Red Cross, according to the specified rules, was optional.\n Women of other faiths could join their ranks. Age limits ranged from 20 to\n 45 years. In contrast to the period of the Crimean War, when many of the\n Holy Cross community sisters, after the expiration of the one-year period\n for which they made a vow, were returning home, these women now had to\n serve indefinitely until the end of the war. Freelance sisters recruited\n in excess of the state, initially in the communities, were placed on full\n allowance of the Red Cross. As for administrative functions, they were\n only allowed to exercise control over hospital workers, and their\n professional activities were limited to the preparation of the simplest\n drugs and materials.\u003cbr\u003e The start of training for women who\n volunteered to join nursing communities was laid out by the so-called\n Medical Community, which consisted of professional physicians who\n conducted theoretical and practical classes for all comers. They sent the\n corresponding proposal to the Headquarters of the Red Cross Society. The\n first course took place from February to May 1877. The number of students\n was about 500 people, but only 171 of them received certificates according\n to the results of final tests. The majority of the attendees of the\n courses were Orthodox, but there were also Catholic, Lutheran and Jewish\n women among the students.\u003cbr\u003e Later, at the initiative of local\n women's committees, similar courses, most often six months, began to\n operate in other cities: Tambov, Kursk, Poltava, Chernigov, Saratov,\n Kostroma, etc. Theoretical studies in these short-term \"schools\"\n included elementary material on pharmacology, compounding, anatomy,\n physiology, hygiene and surgery; women were taught to bandage, assist with\n operations, read and understand recipes, they were told about hospital\n procedures.\u003cbr\u003e Naturally, those who had undergone such short-term\n training did not have a high level of qualification.\u003cbr\u003e Long before\n the main stream of civilian sisters, the troops of the “oldest”\n communities that had already been tested and proved to be effective went\n to Bulgaria. In June-July 1877, seven groups left for Romania and the\n Caucasus, less than 20 people each. 32 cross sisters led by Shchekhovskaya\n and Nadezhdina operated at the main crossing of the Russian units across\n the Danube near Zimnitsa, where they were later replaced by sisters of the\n community of St. George.\u003cbr\u003e 27 sisters of the St. George community\n headed by E.P. Kartseva before the crossing of the Russian troops served\n at stages in Romania, and then were sent to Bulgaria: Tarnovo, Gorni\n Studen, Gabrovo and Bogota. They were among the few who were allowed to\n take advanced positions near besieged Pleven, where the famous surgeon\n N.V. Sklifosovsky, whose attitude towards the presence of women on the\n front line was negative. Moreover, such permission could only be obtained\n from the main representatives of the Red Cross Society. Sklifosovsky\n believed that individuals and detachments of private societies should not\n appear at all near the battlefield, since this entailed a violation of\n subordination and military discipline.\u003cbr\u003e The sisters headed by\n Kartseva, who followed the rapidly advancing Russian detachments, overcame\n the Shipka Pass and, passing through almost the entire territory of\n Bulgaria, worked in Adrianople and Philippopolis, in close proximity to\n Turkey.\u003cbr\u003e 120 sisters of the community called “Quench my sorrows”\n under the leadership of Princess N. B. Shakhovskaya served on the\n territory of Romania, through which Russian troops passed, heading to\n Bulgaria, where the main battles of the new war unfolded. In particular,\n they worked near Galats and Brailov, where the crossing of part of the\n Russian divisions across the Danube took place, as well as in Bulgareni,\n already in Bulgaria, near Pleven.\u003cbr\u003e 90 representatives of the\n “Blagoveshchenskaya” community headed by Sabinina were transferred from\n Crimea to the stages of patients’ transportation in Romania: from Yassy to\n Fratesti, between which the railway were laid. These sisters worked mainly\n on the Red Cross sanitary trains. In July 1877 the group of sisters headed\n by E.M. Bakunina directed to the Caucasian theater of military operations,\n to the Armenian city of Dilijan.\u003cbr\u003e Since June 1877, sisters of the\n Holy Trinity Community (20 people) had been working in Yassy under the\n leadership of E.A. Kublitskaya. Baroness Y.P. Vrevskaya, a friend and\n correspondent of the writer I.S. Turgenev, was in this group.\u003cbr\u003e By\n the end of 1877, the authorities considered the number of sisters in\n military hospitals sufficient and the flow of small groups of community\n sisters and female volunteers was suspended. However, at the beginning of\n 1878, a massive outbreak of typhus began in the army, which also affected\n a large part of the medical staff. In this regard, in February, the second\n stream of newly trained sisters was organized at the site of the battles.\n Moreover, about 50 women, who returned to Russia because of their poor\n health, again went to Bulgaria and the Caucasus, trying to go there with\n enviable persistence. According to rough estimates, about 1,300 women\n participated in this war as medical and sanitary personnel. Of these, more\n than forty died, and almost all suffered one or another form of typhoid\n fever.\u003cbr\u003e As has already been noted, in all sections of Russian\n society, ideas connected with sympathy for the Slavic peoples of the\n Balkans and for rendering all possible assistance to them were very\n popular. Even before the outbreak of hostilities, various charitable\n organizations, including church organizations, collected and sent\n humanitarian supplies there. Since the beginning of the declaration of\n war, the help of the Russians had increased tenfold.\u003cbr\u003e Diocesan\n priests actively promoted such undertakings and set their own example.\n Donations of some of them were very significant. For example, the\n Archangelsk Archbishop Makarii donated 2.0 thousand rubles; Archbishop of\n Lithuania Macarius, Metropolitan of Moscow Innokenty and Bishop of the\n Caucasus Herman contributed 1.0 thousand rubles each, the Right Reverend\n Pavel of Kishinev - 875 rubles; Archbishop of Astrakhan Chrysanth,\n Archbishop of Kharkov Savva and Archbishop of Vyatka Apollos - 500 rub.\n The total sumo which dioceses themselves donated to the army was about 600\n thousand rubles, including: Moscow (104.784 thousand rubles), St.\n Petersburg (up to 56.0 thousand rubles), Kiev (30.907 thousand rubles),\n Vyatka (21.602 thousand rubles), Vologda (19.586 thousand rubles),\n Vladimir (19,127 thousand rubles), Ekaterinoslav (17.818 thousand rubles),\n Poltava (17.735 thousand rubles), Caucasus ( 16,701 thousand rubles.),\n Yaroslavl (15,398 thousand rubles.).\u003cbr\u003e In addition to cash things\n were donated in large quantities everywhere. The total value exceeded\n 300.0 thousand rubles throughout Russia. For example, residents of the\n Vyatka province transferred clothes, shoes, household utensils. Bishop\n Apollos, Bishop of Vyatka and Sloboda, donated a gold pocket watch to the\n General Directorate of the Society for the Care of Wounded and Sick\n Soldiers, asking to use them for their intended purpose. On the initiative\n of the Local Government in 1877, 58,467 sets of top and bottom clothes,\n shoes, bed linen, etc. were manufactured and sent to Moscow and Chisinau.\n The donations were so significant that from 6 to 12 women worked daily in\n the Vyatka warehouse engaged in sorting things. Under the supervision of\n the managers of the warehouse AM. Mender and A.F. Subina cut canvases, of\n which were sewn shirts, aprons, sheets, pillowcases etc. Sewing itself was\n issued to the peasant families for a fixed fee, which supported poor\n women, mostly soldiers’ wives. There were a lot of things needed in\n hospital life. Vyatka warehouse sent to the front 900 sets of hospital\n linen.\u003cbr\u003e In the first place among the donors were Vyatka priests.\n Priest Andrei Zagarsky, senior priest of the Lebyazhsky church in\n Urzhumsky district, gave two canvases, one tablecloth, two women's\n shirts, nine skeins of thread, and so on. Other priests also made their\n own contribution: Archpriest Farmakovsky, priest Nikolai Olyunin, priest\n Aristarkh Avvakumov. Residents of the village of Bogorodsky in Vyatka\n County sent 41 yards of canvas.\u003cbr\u003e The clergy and laity of the\n Voronezh province also took an active part in helping the Slavic peoples\n of the Balkans on the eve of the war and in supporting the army during the\n war.\u003cbr\u003e Voronezh poet Ivan Savich Nikitin in the period of the\n Crimean War in his publications expressed hope for the liberation of the\n enslaved Slavs. A native of the village of Korshevo, Bobrovsky district,\n Alexei Suvorin made a great contribution to the timely familiarization of\n the people of Russia with the events on the fronts of the Russo-Turkish\n war, being the editor of the newspaper \"Novoe Vremya\". In its\n views, Voronezh publicist and historian Mikhail Fyodorovich De-Pule was\n close to the Slavophiles. And the governor himself - Prince Mikhail\n Obolensky - was a relative of the active member of the Slavic committees\n Yury Samarin.\u003cbr\u003e However, on the pages of the provincial\n newspapers, their names stand next to the names of priests, officers and\n peasants undeservedly forgotten in our day, animated by patriotic\n feelings.\u003cbr\u003e Voronezh province was not among the most well-to-do\n and well-maintained, but all of its inhabitants, even the poorest\n peasantry, united to gather for the needs of the Slavs and the Russian\n army, which were heroically fighting in the Balkans.\u003cbr\u003e Many\n citizens of Voronezh sacrificed their lives for the sake of the freedom of\n fraternal peoples.\u003cbr\u003e In 1875, an uprising of the Serbian\n population began in Bosnia and Herzegovina (the Nevesin gun), to suppress\n which the Turkish government used the most brutal methods. In the Serbian\n principality and border areas of Austria-Hungary and Montenegro, a stream\n of refugees rushed. The Serbs who were driven out of their homes often had\n neither food nor warm clothes. Slavic Committees in St. Petersburg,\n Moscow, Kiev and Odessa immediately began to raise funds to assist\n them.\u003cbr\u003e Already in 1875, a representative of the Voronezh Noble\n Assembly sent a letter with a money transfer to the chairman of the Moscow\n Slavic Committee, Ivan Sergeyevich Aksakov: \"I have the honor to send\n you 39 rubles collected by subscription in the Voronezh Noble Assembly in\n favor of the affected families of Herzegovina and Bosnia.\"\u003cbr\u003e\n In total, according to Boris Firsov, in 1876–1877 members of the Voronezh\n Noble Assembly donated 1,000 rubles to the Slavs of the Balkan Peninsula\n and for the construction and maintenance of a hospital for wounded and\n sick soldiers in Voronezh.\u003cbr\u003e In 1876, Russian society was shocked\n by the cruelties shown during the suppression of the uprising in Bulgaria.\n Voronezh province did not stand aside.\u003cbr\u003e In the seventeenth issue\n of the newspaper \"Voronezh Diocesan Gazette\", published on\n September 1, 1876, a letter of July 24 was published, which was forwarded\n from the Voronezh Spiritual Consistory. The letter recommended everyone to\n acquire the newly published collection “Slavic thoughts and voices”, with\n poems by Pushkin, Lermontov, Zhukovsky, Pleshcheyev, Khomyakov, as well as\n Bulgarian, Serbian and Montenegrin, Galician, Polish, Slovenian, Croatian\n poets.\u003cbr\u003e The authors of the letter, in particular, wrote: “Our\n sympathies for the Slavs are understandable, because we are Slavs\n ourselves. The point is that we are strong and free. They are politically\n fragmented and dependent on other nations. In order to strengthen these\n sympathies even more, so that the instinctive love of a Russian person for\n his Slavic brothers can be converted into conscious, rational love — for\n this you need knowledge; it is necessary that the Russian people - all in\n general, and not only the highest educated layers of it - become familiar\n with the rest of the Slavic world, with their thoughts and feelings,\n sorrows and dreams, and in general with the whole structure of its diverse\n life.”\u003cbr\u003e In the same issue of the newspaper, a document\n characteristic of that period was published. This is a letter from Novy\n Kalitva, by a priest of the settlement of Vasily Apollosov, dated November\n 26, 1876. It states: \"In our diocese, every priest directly from\n himself sent and sends ... donations either to Charity Committees existing\n in the capitals, or through various newspaper editorial offices\n ...\".\u003cbr\u003e According to the estimate attached to the letter,\n from the settlement of Novaya Kalitva on June 12, 1876, 30 rubles were\n sent to the St. Petersburg Slavic Committee, on September 18 to the Moscow\n Committee 25 rubles, on October 21 to the Moscow Committee 10 rubles, to\n November 12 to the Moscow Committee 50 rubles.\u003cbr\u003e These sums “make\n up for the most part labor pennies donated by peasants of\n commoners”\u003cbr\u003e Priest Vasily reports that 14 people have pledged to\n continue to make money for the needs of the Slavs: this is, in particular,\n assistant parish clerk Andrei Dmitrichenko, state peasant Efimiy\n Yakovenko, village elder Nikolai Krasnoyaruzhsky.\u003cbr\u003e These\n donations were not the only ones: on September 20, 1876, peasants of the\n Voronezh province donated money and 50 yards of canvas to families\n affected in Bosnia, Herzegovina and Bulgaria.\u003cbr\u003e April 15, 1877 in\n Voronezh Troitsko-Smolensk Cathedral in the presence of the governor MA.\n Obolensky a manifest on declaring war on Turkey was read.\u003cbr\u003e By the\n end of April, the city council decided to allocate 20 thousand rubles for\n the needs of the army and to take over the maintenance of 50 beds in a\n local military hospital. In response to the Governor’s report on this\n donation, he received a telegram of thanks from Empress Maria\n Alexandrovna. The amount of donations to the needs of the army by January\n 1, 1878 reached 145,224 rubles.\u003cbr\u003e The following “Statement to the\n Editor” appeared on the pages of the Diocesan newspaper:\u003cbr\u003e\n \"In 1877, May 5, we, the undersigned, Bogucharsky district of the\n settlement of the New Assumption Church, sacredly and clergymen, after\n reading in the church of the Imperial Manifesto about the entry of Russian\n troops into the Turkish possessions and after serving the Lord God the\n prayer for giving our Orthodox Christian victory to the Orthodox over the\n enemies, expressed their zealous desire during the whole continuation of\n the war to sacrifice to the sick — wounded soldiers of 2% from the ruble\n of all our monetary incomes coming into the general circle, and in what we\n subscribe.\u003cbr\u003e Sloboda Novobelo Assumption Church priest Yevgeny\n Prokopiev, assistant abbot priest Gregory Manuilov. Deacon Mokiy Chuev.\n Deacon Vasily Rajewski. Psalms: Peter Krasnobashtov, Dimitri Stefanov,\n Ivan Popov.\u003cbr\u003e On May 29, 1877 a hospital of the Red Cross Society\n was opened in Voronezh, designed for 350 wounded, which operated for\n almost a year. On July 27, 1877, the vicar Bishop of Ostrogozhsk,\n Benjamin, consecrated in the provincial city the temporary church of the\n Great Martyr and Healer Panteleimon at the hospital for wounded\n soldiers.\u003cbr\u003e In the summer of 1877, Metropolitan Michael of Serbia\n was staying on the territory of the Voronezh diocese. On July 7, he\n arrived at the Zadonsky Bogoroditsky Monastery, where on July 8 he served\n the Divine Liturgy, and in the evening of the same day he left for Moscow.\n He was presented with the icon of St. Tikhon.\u003cbr\u003e On June 6, the\n provincial leader of the nobility P.F. Panyutin informed the acting\n Governor I.A. Zvegintsov that on June 5 an extraordinary provincial\n nobility meeting took place, at which it was decided to donate 20 thousand\n rubles for families of officers and lower ranks participating in the\n military campaign. Then a printed sheet was published “for general\n information” - an announcement to the residents of the province. It was\n reported: \"Mr. Voronezh provincial leader of the Nobility has the\n honor to make it universally known that the Voronezh extraordinary\n provincial nobility meeting, according to his decision, on June 5, 1877,\n approved by Mr. Minister of Internal Affairs, donated twenty thousand\n rubles for the issuance of cash benefits, in 1st, for families of\n gentlemen officers and lower ranks of the natives of the Voronezh\n province, who are in a helpless position, due to the lack of the sole\n breadwinners called up for service, be able to work their representatives,\n and at 2nd, families of the officers and lower ranks of Voronezh province\n natives who have undergone extremes of wounds due to injuries or death in\n war members of those families. The basis for the families of such\n gentlemen officers and lower ranks of monthly and one-time allowances\n should be the certificates of the Voronezh provincial leader or county\n leaders of the nobility of those districts of the Voronezh province where\n the families needing allowance both the marital status and the inadequate\n status requesting allowance. On the basis of these certificates, the\n issuance of benefits is made in the Voronezh provincial district council,\n or through the district councils, who apply for allowance at the place of\n residence.”\u003cbr\u003e The diocesan newspaper published lists of the died\n and missing residents of the Voronezh province in the Russo-Turkish\n war.\u003cbr\u003e The Kostroma Diocese, whose borders coincided with the\n borders of the Kostroma province, also provided significant support during\n the Russian-Turkish war of 1877-1878. Russian army and southern\n Slavs.\u003cbr\u003e In Kostroma diocese groups of compassionate brothers and\n sisters were formed. The main work in this area was carried out in the\n Kostroma Epiphany Anastasiinsky monastery, where a detachment of 66\n compassionate sisters was created and material was collected for hospitals\n from most diocesan monasteries. As a result, the Makariyev-Unzhensky\n monastery transferred to the Red Cross Society 320 arshins of canvas and\n 15 skeins of thread for 30 rubles, the Avraamievo-Gorodetsky 775 arshins\n of canvas for 70 rubles, the Forerunner Zheleznoborovsky donated 6 pounds\n of canvas, more than 10,000 arshins, for 100 R. The Kostroma Ladies\n Committee of the Society for the Care of Wounded and Wounded Soldiers\n acted in the Epiphany Monastery itself. By January 1, 1878, 800 poods of\n linen, clothes and other accessories were manufactured and sent to\n operating army units through central warehouses.\u003cbr\u003e Galichsky\n Trinity Belbazhsky maidens, Nikolaevsky Starotorzhsky maidens, the\n Virgin-Fedorovsky monasteries, as well as the Virgin-Fedorovskaya and\n Kineshma-Voznesenskaya women's communities also took an active\n part.\u003cbr\u003e By the lace collection was collected 833 p. 66 kopecks in\n the monastery, and 5489.44 rubles. in parish and cathedral\n churches.\u003cbr\u003e  A hospital for sick and wounded soldiers was also\n created in the Epiphany Monastery: in the subordinate Holy Cross Monastery\n under its jurisdiction, 2 rooms with 60 beds were allocated for these\n needs, 1 building with 15 beds, the house adjacent to the monastery -\n under the Ladies workshop Committee, outbuilding of the building - under\n the warehouse of donations things. The monastery, at its own expense,\n repaired buildings: renovation of exterior wall cladding and painting,\n provision of water from the city reservoir, upholstery of the warehouse’s\n internal walls and installation of stoves in it, at a cost of about 2,000\n rubles. The Ipatiev Monastery provided a reserve building located outside\n the monastery, with the possibility of accommodating up to 10 beds, with\n the availability of a kitchen, and also provided an unlimited and\n completely free supply of all the necessary food for cooking.\n Makariyevo-Unzhensky, Bogoroditsa-Igritsky, Gorodetsky Avraamiev,\n Nikolo-Babaevsky and Predtechensky Zheleznoborovsky monasteries, as well\n as the Krivoezerskaya desert, expressed their willingness to rebuild\n adjacent monasteries, monastic hotels and some outbuildings that could be\n converted for a short time and sick.\u003cbr\u003e During the years of the\n Russo-Turkish war 1877-1878 in the cities and villages of the Tambov\n province guardships were established to assist families called up for war.\n A significant role in their activities was played by the parish clergy.\n According to the testimony of the report on the state of the Tambov\n diocese for 1877, the Bishop of Tambov and Shatsk Palladium “Despite the\n unequal security, all monasteries, both male and female, responded readily\n to the appeals of various people of charitable societies to donate to the\n Slavs of the Balkan Peninsula and in favor of our Russian Orthodox\n soldiers who have shed their blood for the holy work of freeing their\n brothers by faith and blood from the Muslim yoke. They were donated by ...\n female monasteries: Sukhota’s 124 rubles in money and 6 pounds of things.”\n The donation of the monastery was significant at that time and was not\n inferior in size to the aid of the larger monasteries. Further in the\n report it was noted that “the last war caused the desire of many brothers\n and sisters to work hard to help the wounded and sick of our soldiers.\n During the past year, they expressed a desire to enter the orderlies and\n sisters of mercy: 2 hieromonks, 2 monks, 1 deacon, 2 novices, 2 nuns and\n 23 novices. According to the actual need of the Red Cross, 12 novices of\n the Tambov Sukhota monastery were sent to the sisters of mercy.”\n \u003cbr\u003e\n \u003cstrong\u003eIV. CONCLUSION\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e Thus, the Russian\n Orthodox Church rendered significant assistance in the provision of\n materials for the army and in helping the wounded during the years of the\n Russian-Turkish war of 1877-1878. Church organizations not only organized\n charitable activities on their own, but also called on all representatives\n of Russian society to do the same. It can be argued that the clergy were\n among the main instigators and organizers of various actions aimed at\n supporting the Russian army and the liberated Slavic peoples.\u003cbr\u003e\n Significant was the role of the Church in the activities of the new for\n Russia charitable organization - the Red Cross Society. It began in the\n years of the Crimean War, when, with the blessing of the Church, the\n sisters of mercy for the first time in large numbers began to serve the\n wounded and sick during military operations. On the eve and in the years\n of the Russo-Turkish war in 1877-1878. This organization received its\n legal and administrative clearance. The Russian Red Cross Society was not\n exclusively Orthodox, nevertheless the overwhelming majority of\n professional sisters of mercy who served in it and volunteers professed\n Orthodoxy.\u003cbr\u003e The Russian provincial clergy made a major\n contribution to the organization of charitable assistance to the military\n and civilian population during this war. The sufferings of the Slavic\n peoples of the Balkans and the difficult conditions in which the Russian\n army found itself during the foreign campaign were constantly in the\n center of attention of the clergy of the Russian provinces. These problems\n were widely reported on the pages of the local church press. Provincial\n clergymen actively participated in the propaganda of the war of\n liberation, made significant donations themselves and called for their\n parishioners to do the same.   \u003cstrong\u003eREFERENCE LIST\u003c/strong\u003e\n \u003cbr\u003e Aitkaliev V.A.,\n (2014) The Russian Orthodox Church. 159 p.\u003cbr\u003e Akinshin A.N., (2000)\n Governor Mikhail Obolensky in 1874-1878. Voronezh Governors and\n Vice-Governors. Pp. 265-274.\u003cbr\u003e Arkhipov S.V., (2015) Charity of\n the Russian Orthodox Church during the Russian-Turkish war (1877-1878).\n History and political science. Pp. 126-127.\u003cbr\u003e Ashmarov I.A.,\n (2009) Historical experience of the state solution of labor problems in\n Russia  Economic history in discussions: Interun. Sat scientific papers\n Issue 3. Voronezh State Technical University. Pp.17-29.\u003cbr\u003e Ashmarov\n I.A., Ershov B.A, (2018) Church as a social and economic institution of\n society  II International Scientific and Practical Conference Orthodoxy\n and Society: the Edge of Interaction. Chita: Pp. 11-19.\u003cbr\u003e Ashmarov\n I.A., Latysheva L.P., (2009) Possibilities of humanistic values in times\n of crisis Risk and danger society of the 21st century: forecasts,\n scenarios for overcoming the crisis: the works of All-Russia. scientific\n conf. Voronezh State Technical University. Pp.120-123.\u003cbr\u003e Belova\n E.E., (2010) The Sisters of Mercy during the Russo-Turkish War\n (1877–1878). 110 p.\u003cbr\u003e Berdyaev N.A., (1994) The Philosophy of the\n Free Spirit. 480 p.\u003cbr\u003e Ershov B.A., (2010) Church tenure of the\n Russian province in the XIX century Society. Wednesday. Development. №  4\n (17). Pp. 38-42.\u003cbr\u003e Ershov B.A., (2010) Sisters of Mercy and the\n Orthodox Church of the Russian Province of the XIX Century. Bulletin of\n the Voronezh State Technical University. Pp. 204-209.\u003cbr\u003e Ershov\n B.A., (2011) Family foundations of clergy in the provinces of the Central\n Chernozem region in the XIX century. Historical, philosophical, political\n and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory\n and practice. №  2-2 (8). Pp. 68-71.\u003cbr\u003e Ershov B.A., (2012) The\n Russian Orthodox Church in the system of state relations in the XIX -\n early XX centuries. (on materials of the Central Black Earth provinces)\n dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences. Kursk State\n University.  412 p.\u003cbr\u003e Ershov B.A., (2013) The Russian Orthodox\n Church in the structure of government in the XIX - early XX centuries.\n Voronezh State Technical University. 245 p.\u003cbr\u003e Geller N.Y., (2007)\n History of the Russian Empire. 304 s.\u003cbr\u003e Kolyshnitsyna N.V., (2009)\n St. Petersburg Slavic Charitable Society and the Organization of\n Assistance to the Bulgarian Slavs. History of Petersburg. P.\n 79-92.\u003cbr\u003e Moskvina V.M., (2007) On the Issue of the Participation\n of the Military clergy in Cultural and Leisure Work in the Armed Forces of\n Russia. Scientific research in education. Pp. 134-136.\u003cbr\u003e Posternak\n A.V., (2001) Essays on the history of sisters of mercy communities. 304\n p.\u003cbr\u003e Shashin S.I., (2008) Vyatka People during the Russo-Turkish\n war (1877-1878). Vyatka Scientific Notes. Pp. 85-98.\u003cbr\u003e Ulunyan\n A.A., (2006) The Russo-Turkish war and the Russian Public. Russia and\n Bulgaria. Pp. 52-64.\u003cbr\u003e Zakharov I.S., (1997) Nikolai Pirogov. 250\n p.  ","descriptionType":"Other"}],"geoLocations":[],"fundingReferences":[],"url":"https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.17916/P6V880","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":28,"schemaVersion":"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4","source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":261,"downloadCount":20,"referenceCount":0,"citationCount":0,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2018-11-17T22:41:50Z","registered":"2018-11-17T22:41:51Z","published":null,"updated":"2026-01-27T18:40:59Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"dryad.dryad","type":"clients"}}}},{"id":"10.17916/p64s3r","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p64s3r","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"Ershov, Bogdan","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Bogdan","familyName":"Ershov","affiliation":["Voronezh State Technical University"],"nameIdentifiers":[{"schemeUri":"https://orcid.org","nameIdentifier":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-0350","nameIdentifierScheme":"ORCID"}]},{"name":"Fursov, Vladimir","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Vladimir","familyName":"Fursov","affiliation":["Voronezh State Pedagogical University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]}],"titles":[{"title":"MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND ORTHODOX TRADITIONS IN RUSSIA"}],"publisher":"Dryad","container":{},"publicationYear":2019,"subjects":[{"subject":"charity"},{"subject":"church"},{"subject":"medicine"},{"subject":"priest."},{"subject":"state"}],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2018-07-26T21:18:45Z","dateType":"Issued"},{"date":"2018-07-26T21:18:45Z","dateType":"Available"},{"date":"2019-03-23T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Updated"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[{"relationType":"IsCitedBy","relatedIdentifier":"http://www.ocerint.org/intcess18_e-publication/papers/34.pdf","relatedIdentifierType":"URL"}],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["874937 bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"11","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","rightsIdentifier":"cc-by-4.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"The article examines the participation and assistance of the Orthodox\n Church in solving problems that allowed to give a scientific justification\n for the cooperation of health care and Orthodox religious institutions, to\n determine their role in the historical context and structure of modern\n healthcare in Russia. The article presents an algorithm for organizing\n sisters of mercy, their system of upbringing. Particular attention is\n given to the possibility of teaching the course \"Foundations of\n Orthodox Culture\" in secular educational institutions. Research\n materials can serve as a basis for the formation of morally sound\n positions of medical workers and the population on the main problems of\n medical activity. Based on the study, the authors published a series of\n articles in which the experience of the work of the Orthodox Church in the\n charitable sphere has been summarized. This experience can be used to\n create new charitable institutions, including those who provided medical\n assistance. In preparing the article, the authors used concrete\n historical, civilizational, formational and social methods of research\n that allowed us to uncover facts, phenomena and processes in the\n interconnection and unity of the past, present and future.  ","descriptionType":"Abstract"},{"description":"The study was conducted in\n the methodological field of the sociology of medicine. The research\n program was of a multistage nature and provided for the use of a\n methodology based on traditional methods of socio-hygienic,\n medical-organizational and historical-analytical nature, adapted to the\n specifics of the purposes followed by statistical processing and data\n analysis. In the work to achieve the goal and implement research tasks, a\n number of methods of concrete sociology are offered: a survey, in-depth\n interviews, expert interviews, content analysis, a biographical\n method3.\u003cbr\u003e The organizational chart of the interaction of Orthodox\n organizations and bodies of practical health, developed in this article,\n is based on historical traditions of the charitable activities of the\n Russian Orthodox Church. This scheme takes into account modern\n socio-economic realities. This scheme proved to be effective in the\n organization of medical care and can serve as a basic model for the\n development of cooperation between the Church and medical institutions.\n Given the deep historical evidence of the important role of Orthodox\n Christianity in preserving health and creating a healthy lifestyle for the\n population, it should be recognized that the development of special\n programs for cooperation between medical organizations and the Church is\n justified in modern conditions.","descriptionType":"Methods"},{"description":"  \u003cstrong\u003eI.\n INTRODUCTION\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  \u003cbr\u003e State-church relations\n as a combination of historically emerging and changing forms of relations\n between state institutions and religious organizations are one of the main\n parts of the domestic and foreign policies of any state. Russia has always\n been a multi-confessional country, here all major religious confessions\n coexist: Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism. At the same time, in the\n modern Russian consciousness there is a close connection between Orthodoxy\n and national identity.  \u003cbr\u003e 80-82% of the population of Russia\n consider themselves Orthodox. The role of the Russian Orthodox Church in\n the economic and social life of the country was significant throughout the\n history of the country until October 1917. Even in the Old Russian period,\n the spiritual foundations of charity were formed under the influence of\n selfconsciousness. Since the late 1980's. in our country, the gradual\n return of the Church to the sphere of charity and medical and social\n services began, the process of uniting the interests of the Church and the\n state in the field of protecting human health was intensified.  \n The main legal documents\n in this area were the \"Fundamentals of Legislation on the Protection\n of Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation\" of 1993 and the\n \"Agreement on Cooperation between the Ministry of Health of the\n Russian Federation and the Russian Orthodox Church.\" The importance\n of the church mission in the health sector was expressed in the creation\n of hospital temples, church hospitals and an almshouse. The number of\n monasteries engaged in social activities is increasing, fraternities are\n being organized. At the same time, the catastrophic situation in the field\n of public health in Russia is growing. The state public health system is\n developing mainly around the world, the volume of medical care often\n increases without regard for quality.  \u003cbr\u003e Many researchers believe\n that the public health system can not function effectively under the\n current conditions. In this connection, studies that reflect the\n relationship between the Church and medical institutions in modern Russia\n are of great importance.\u003cbr\u003e   \u003cstrong\u003eII.\n RESULTS\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  \u003cbr\u003e The article shows the\n results, which testify that medical and social assistance to the\n population of Russia is mainly under the aegis of monasteries. The nature\n and scope of this assistance in different periods were not the same and\n depended on the policy of state power towards the Church. If at the\n initial stages of the country's development there were no other\n shelters for the sick and disabled, with the exception of monasteries. By\n the beginning of the 20th century, shelters occupied a leading position in\n state, public and charitable organizations. They created a unique system\n of medical and social assistance to the population. The church has been\n active in this area since the late 1980s, and both traditional and new\n forms and methods of medico-social and charitable work were\n realized.\u003cbr\u003e The cooperation of the Church and the state in the\n field of health and social services, the legal basis of which is in the\n process of formation, testifies to the recognition of the Church in the\n life of Russian society, contributes to the expansion of social health and\n the participation of a wide range of people to solve health problems and\n revive the spiritual traditions of medicine. The Orthodox Church provides\n medical and social assistance to the following groups of people: terminal,\n somatic, mental, HIVinfected, drug addicts, patients with toxic and\n alcoholic diseases. The expediency of creating hospitals for religious\n confessions as a whole was recognized by 41.7% of doctors and 46.1% of\n patients.\u003cbr\u003e In addition, it can be noted that the main types of\n institutions that are actively engaged in medical and social activities\n are: a) medical institutions of a stationary type, incl. hospitals\n operating under the Moscow Patriarchate, diocesan hospitals, monastery\n hospitals, hospitals in theological schools; (b) outpatient medical\n facilities, including first aid centers for religious schools, monastic\n medical posts; (c) Medical and social institutions. For example, the\n diocesan hospital of Saint Blessed Xenia helps orphans and elderly people.\n The average length of stay in the hospital is 31 days. Among the patients,\n pensioners were 95.4%, disabled people - 71.3%, lonely - 30.4%. The\n hospital staff was selected from among Orthodox believers. The\n satisfaction of patients with treatment is high (98.4%) and the ratio of\n medical personnel (100.0%).\u003cbr\u003e A special form of medical and social\n activities of the Church are care centers (in 2016 in the Russian\n Federation, 14), designed for outpatient rehabilitation of mentally ill,\n alcoholics and drug addicts affected by totalitarian sects, psychics. The\n task of Orthodox priests and doctors is to closely cooperate in these\n centers. The course of rehabilitation takes an average of 1-2 years. In\n addition to institutions, the Church creates medical organizations that\n carry out their ministry in public medical and social institutions: for\n example, the society of Orthodox doctors; sisterhood of mercy, brotherhood\n of mercy, parish communities of hospital temples. The Society of Orthodox\n Physicians is a new form of association of medical workers for Russia on\n the basis of a religious community. Their goal is to provide medical and\n spiritual assistance to sick poor people, coordinate the activities of\n charitable brotherhoods and sisterhoods, organize a system of qualified\n diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive care for churchmen, discuss current\n medical problems in accordance with the canons of the Orthodox Church. For\n example, the society in Moscow consists of medical , scientific and\n educational and training departments. For the years 2000-2016. The number\n of people seeking help was about 25,000 people. Training courses for\n Orthodox doctors and psychologists have been organized.\u003cbr\u003e Today,\n the centers of the sisters of mercy, organized in Russia in the XIX\n century, demonstrated their effectiveness. Based on the analysis of the\n development of nursing, five main stages (periods) of the movement of\n nurses in Russia were identified. The distinctive features of this\n movement were medical and social assistance, strict morality, love and\n charity toward one's neighbor, diligence and dedication, discipline.\n In 2016, there are about 40 communities and groups of sisters of mercy in\n Russia. An algorithm for creating a community of sisters of mercy is\n developed and conceptual principles of its organization are formulated.\n  \u003cbr\u003e The main thing is to find a job for a sister, where she can\n perform church obedience in addition to medical, within the framework of\n jointly developed contract documents regulating the status and order of\n service in the conditions of a particular institution. Clearly organized\n sisterhoods, consisting of religious, morally educated and at the same\n time professionally trained sisters, can undoubtedly provide more\n effective assistance to public health institutions and social workers,\n since there is a shortage of medical specialists of junior and middle\n level.\u003cbr\u003e The activities of nurses, based on Christian charity,\n combine medical care with spiritual care for the patient. The main goal of\n the sisterhood was to strengthen the moral and spiritual foundations of\n society.\u003cbr\u003e As a result, today the revival of the brotherly and\n sister movement is an objective process of returning to traditional forms\n of religious life in Russia. At the same time, the current socio-economic\n situation in the country does not allow many Orthodox movements and\n organizations to revive the church and social life and fully understand\n the tasks of social services.\u003cbr\u003e Despite the positive results in\n the social and philanthropic activities of individual brotherhoods and\n sisterhoods, the author believes that the revival of the sister movement\n is associated with the same problems that led to the suspension of the\n work of Orthodox brotherhoods. Today, 150 brotherhoods and sisterhoods\n registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation operate\n independently and in isolation, without information and\n coordination.\u003cbr\u003e However, despite the artificial suppression of the\n fraternal movement, the Unions of Orthodox brotherhoods should be\n attributed to institutions that seek to mobilize community and church\n organizations to jointly solve social, spiritual and ethical problems. In\n these unions, new technologies are being developed in various fields of\n medicine.\u003cbr\u003e Thus, history shows that such forms of Orthodox life\n as brotherhood and sisterhood, unlike secular and some church\n institutions, can not be created or canceled only \"from above\".\n They are based on believers and want to fulfill one or another church\n ministry together.   \u003cstrong\u003eIII.  DISCUSSION\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n        \u003cbr\u003e Some aspects of the participation of the Russian\n Orthodox Church in protecting public health were examined in the works of\n Mirsky MB, Pospelovsky D., Siluyanova IV, Filimonova SV, Cherkasova AE.\n and other domestic scientists. However, few works are devoted to a\n comprehensive study of the interaction of the Russian Orthodox Church with\n medical personnel. Almost in the scientific literature, there was no\n analysis of the participation of the Russian Orthodox Church in protecting\n the health of the population of the Voronezh Region.       \u003cbr\u003e The\n author of this article proposes to classify various aspects of the\n historiography of this problem by periods. The first historiographical\n period - from the beginning of the XIX century to the 70-ies. At that\n time, a complex historical work was carried out to collect and publish\n materials that had the character of historical data, reference data, the\n Charter of various institutions of public charity and education. Studies\n were often onesided and subjective, devoid of profound scientific medical\n analysis.       \u003cbr\u003e The second historiographical period from the\n 70s. XIX century until 1917. During this period, a great leap was made in\n historical science for the collection, processing and publication of\n official documents and extensive factual materials, as well as\n bibliographic indexes. In the works of EE Golubinsky, AP Dobrolonsky, SG\n Runkevich, Runovsky, Znamensky, Klyuchevsky, Barsov, FV Blagovidov, B.\n Titlipov, B.II. Kudryavtseva, Papkova, Prugavina, Makariya (Bulgakova),\n Berdyaeva, various aspects of the development of medical charity were\n systematized. Scientists also considered the medical and social role of\n church parishes in the development of assistance to the needy.      \n  \u003cbr\u003e There was a significant amount of biographical work, about the\n most vivid representatives of the parish clergy and their ministry.\n Statistical information on the total number of medical societies and\n fraternities in the Russian Empire is also found in the encyclopedia\n \"Russia\", published in 1898.\u003cbr\u003e A valuable group are\n modern published reports and surveys that contain data on the history of\n the church and statistical work. Therefore, the relevance of studying the\n problems associated with the embodiment of Christian ideals in medical\n practice, both public and secular authors, is topical.\u003cbr\u003e Thus, in\n this article, all of the above indicates the necessity and importance of\n scientific research, conducted in terms of a systematic approach, in-depth\n analysis, justification and implementation of results in educational and\n medical institutions.\u003cbr\u003e   \u003cstrong\u003eIV.  CONCLUSION\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n  \u003cbr\u003e Currently, the medical and social charitable activities of the\n Russian Orthodox Church are actively developing. The cooperation of\n Orthodox organizations with medical institutions can give such positive\n results as: the revival of the spiritual traditions of medicine; awareness\n of the interdependence of man's spiritual and physical health;\n attraction of additional financial, organizational and especially human\n resources for medical care; formation of morally grounded positions of\n medical workers and the population on the main problems of medical ethics\n (bioethics); formation of a healthy lifestyle of the population and\n combating the spread of bad habits; expansion of the base of social health\n and involvement of the general public in solving health\n problems.\u003cbr\u003e The views of doctors and patients on the problems of\n clinical ethics (the relationship between a doctor and a patient,\n including the ethics of informing, obtaining informed consent for\n treatment, confidence indicators, medical secrets, etc.) are not very\n dependent on their attitude to the Orthodox faith. In the performance of\n their duties, most doctors prefer professional views on\n medicine.\u003cbr\u003e The opinions of many doctors and patients about modern\n medical technologies are not yet formed, they have no solid moral\n justification. There are significant differences in the assessment of\n modern biotechnology of doctors and patients, depending on their religious\n affiliations, and the views of church members are more in line with the\n norms of religious morality and medical ethics.\u003cbr\u003e The\n organizational chart of the interaction of Orthodox organizations and\n bodies of practical health, developed in this article, is based on\n historical traditions of the charitable activities of the Russian Orthodox\n Church19. This scheme takes into account modern socio-economic realities,\n has proved effective in the organization of medical services and can\n become a basic model for the development of cooperation between the Church\n and medical institutions.\u003cbr\u003e   \u003cstrong\u003eREFERENCE\n LIST\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  \u003cbr\u003e American Medical Association,\n Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, Ethical considerations in the\n allocation of organs and other scarce medical resources for patients.\n Archives of Internal Medicine. (1995)  № 155.  Pp. 29-40.\u003cbr\u003e\n Benrubi, G. I., (1992) Euthanasia - the Need for Procedural Safeguards. \n New England Journal of Medicine. № 326/3. 198 p.\u003cbr\u003e Cyril,\n Metropolitan. (2000) On the «Fundamentals of the Social Concept of the\n Russian Orthodox Church» The Anniversary Bishops' Council of the\n Russian Orthodox Church. Collection of reports and documents. Pp.\n 133-149.\u003cbr\u003e Dmitrieva, (1998) T.B. On urgent measures to implement\n the Concept of the Development of Health Care and Medical Science in the\n Russian Federation.  Problems of Social Hygiene and the History of\n Medicine.  № 1. Pp. 25-28\u003cbr\u003e Glushkova, V.A. (1985) Medical error\n and accident in medical practice.  Clinical surgery. № 1.  Pp. 63\n 64.\u003cbr\u003e Gromov, A.P. (1988) Medical duty, medical responsibility,\n medical secret Deontology in medicine. Pp. 73-122.\u003cbr\u003e International\n Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH). International Code of Ethics for\n Occupational Health Professionals (1992)  Bull. Med. № 82. Pp.\n 9-11.\u003cbr\u003e Ivanov, A.E. (1993) Mental Health of the Population:\n Demographic Aspect.  Health Protection of the Russian Federation. № 12.\n Pp. 7-11.\u003cbr\u003e Karpov, A.S. (2002) On the interaction of state\n bodies, health services and the Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian\n Orthodox Church.  Health. № 12. Pp. 12-16.\u003cbr\u003e Kondratiev,  F.V.\n (2001)  Orthodox-ethical aspects of euthanasia.  Orthodoxy and problems of\n bioethics. 98 p.\u003cbr\u003e Largey G., (1978) Reproductive technologies:\n sex selection  Reich W. T. (ed.). Encyclopedia of bioethics.-The Free\n Press, New York. Pp. 1439-1443.\u003cbr\u003e Matveev, G.N. (2001) The modern\n hospital and the rights of the believer.  Sisterhood. № 2. Pp.\n 38-39.\u003cbr\u003e Miller, F. G., (1994) Regulating Physician Assisted\n Death, New England. Journal of Medicine. № 14. 120 p.\u003cbr\u003e Health\n Reforms: Problems and Prospects (2001)  Orthodoxy and Bioethics. Pp.\n 91-95.\u003cbr\u003e Shchepin, О.P. (2001) Problems of health of the\n population of the Russian Federation and its forecast for the period up to\n 2005.  Problems of social medicine, public health services and history of\n medicine.  № 3. Pp.  3-10.\u003cbr\u003e Shevchenko, Y.L. (2000) Priority\n tasks of the Russian public health services for 2000. Bulletin of\n compulsory medical insurance. № 1. Pp.  4-6.\u003cbr\u003e Siluyanova, I.V.\n (1998) Modern Medicine and Orthodoxy. Moscow: Publishing House of Holy\n Trinity Sergius Lavra. 296 p.\u003cbr\u003e Sorokina, Т.S. (1994) Russian\n Sisters of Mercy in the Crimean campaign of 1854-1856. Problems of social\n hygiene and history of medicine. № 6.  Pp. 51-53.\u003cbr\u003e Vasileva, O.Y.\n (1993)  Russian Orthodox Church and Soviet Power in 1917-1927. Voprosy\n istorii. № 8. Pp. 40-54.\u003cbr\u003e Vlasov,  P.V. (1987) History of the\n formation of nurses in Russia. Med. sister. № 3. Pp. 248-249.   \n  ","descriptionType":"Other"}],"geoLocations":[],"fundingReferences":[],"url":"https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.17916/P64S3R","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":28,"schemaVersion":"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4","source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":384,"downloadCount":24,"referenceCount":1,"citationCount":1,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2018-07-26T21:19:01Z","registered":"2018-07-26T21:20:06Z","published":null,"updated":"2026-01-27T18:38:48Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"dryad.dryad","type":"clients"}}}},{"id":"10.17916/p6f59m","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p6f59m","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"Ershov, Bogdan","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Bogdan","familyName":"Ershov","affiliation":["Voronezh State Technical University"],"nameIdentifiers":[{"schemeUri":"https://orcid.org","nameIdentifier":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-0350","nameIdentifierScheme":"ORCID"}]},{"name":"Ashmarov, Igor","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Igor","familyName":"Ashmarov","affiliation":["Voronezh State Academy of Arts"],"nameIdentifiers":[]}],"titles":[{"title":"METHODOLOGY OF HISTORICAL AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH: A RETROSPECTIVE VIEW"}],"publisher":"Dryad","container":{},"publicationYear":2019,"subjects":[],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2018-06-16T20:50:34Z","dateType":"Issued"},{"date":"2018-06-16T20:50:34Z","dateType":"Available"},{"date":"2019-03-27T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Updated"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["547936 bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"4","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","rightsIdentifier":"cc-by-4.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"  This data set represents an analysis of historical and economic\n methods of production management in modern Russia. The need to generalize\n the accumulated theoretical and empirical material, to find new approaches\n to the evaluation of modern production, to study both general and specific\n laws of the process of transforming the structure of social production is\n shown. The features of this process in countries with different levels of\n economic development are studied. Particular attention is paid to the\n dynamics of social production in the postindustrial era, where the\n development of information and communication technologies comes to the\n fore.  ","descriptionType":"Abstract"},{"description":"The\n methodological basis of the study was the methods of logical and\n statistical analysis, mapping of graphic data, a method of comparing\n scales and comparing the analyzed phenomena and processes in the economic\n reality. Using a set of these methods of scientific knowledge made it\n possible to ensure the reliability of analysis and synthesis results\n obtained in the process of data analysis and to formulate a number of\n author's conclusions applicable in theory and practice. The study was\n conducted using tools and methods of institutional and systemic\n approaches.","descriptionType":"Methods"},{"description":"\u003cstrong\u003eTheme 1. THE\n SUBJECT OF THE COURSE. PREFEUDAL ECONOMY\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e Course subject and\n its meaning. Elements of the history of the economy as a science.\n Periodization of the history of the economy. Functions of the history of\n the economy. Methods of the history of the economy. Early branches of\n human economic activity and division of labour. The main features of the\n primitive communal system. Origin of craft. The appearance of metal tools.\n Decomposition of the primitive communal system. Prerequisites for the\n emergence of socio-economic inequalities in primitive society. General\n characteristics of the slave-owning mode of production. The economy of the\n countries of the Ancient East. Development of agriculture, crafts and\n trade. Characteristic features of ancient slavery. The economy of ancient\n Greek city-states. Features of the economic development of ancient\n Rome.\u003cbr\u003e   \u003cstrong\u003eTheme 2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE\n PERIOD OF FEUDALISM\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e General characteristics of the feudal mode of\n production. Basic principles of feudalism. Stages of development of\n feudalism. Natural economy under feudalism. Economy of the Frankish state.\n Agriculture of Western Europe and its features in France, Germany and\n England. Feudal cities as centers of craft and trading activities. Shop\n organization of production. The role of trade in the birth of early\n capitalist relations. Changes in the agricultural economy of Kievan Rus.\n Development of crafts. The origin of commodity-money relations. Foreign\n trade relations of Kievan Rus. The economy of independent large\n principalities. Influence of the Mongol-Tatar invasion on the economic\n development of the Russian lands. The development of the north-eastern\n lands and the growth of cities. Restoration and development of Russian\n craft. The basic forms of feudal landownership. The economy of the feudal\n fiefdom. Socio-economic reasons for the unification of Russian lands.\n Formation of a local land tenure system. The main features of the feudal\n landlord economy. Turning cities into crafts and trade centres. The\n transformation of craft into small-scale production. The appearance of\n manufactories, their types. The role of the state in the creation of\n manufactories. Structure of foreign trade relations of the state. The\n policy of mercantilism. Essence of economic reforms of   \u003cstrong\u003eTheme 3. GENESIS\n OF CAPITALISTIC ECONOMY\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e Industrial\n development of England. Features of capitalist accumulation. Freedom of\n entrepreneurship. Leadership of England in world industry and trade. The\n transition from manufactory to factory production. Creation of the first\n machines. Railway construction. Structure of the English industry.\n Socio-economic consequences of the industrial revolution. Growth in the\n proportion of urban population. The formation of farm capitalist farms in\n the countryside. The policy of free trade in international trade. London\n as a world financial center. Features of the industrial revolution in\n France and its lag behind England. The industrial and agrarian nature of\n the economy. Small-scale peasant production. Slow development of\n capitalism in agriculture. Types of colonial farming in North America. The\n agrarian nature of the economy. Organization of centralized manufactories.\n Contradictions between the North American colonies and England. The\n creation of the United States and the establishment of capitalist economic\n relations. American way of development of capitalism in agriculture. The\n rapid completion of the industrial revolution. Economic causes and\n consequences of the Civil War in the United States. A significant rise in\n the American economy. \u003cbr\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTheme 4. FEATURES OF CAPITALISM\n IN RUSSIA, GERMANY AND JAPAN\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e The beginning of the\n transition to large-scale machine production. Industrial revolution in\n Russia and its features. Trade, finance and credit. The crisis of serfdom.\n Increasing the agricultural marketability. The origin of capitalist\n relations in agriculture. Basic provisions and significance of the reform\n of 1861. Dissemination of share capital. The main industrial regions of\n the country. Railway construction. Inflow of foreign capital. The\n predominant role of agriculture. Stratification of the peasantry and the\n formation of a market for hired labor. The development of stationary trade\n and commodity exchanges. Growth in foreign trade turnover. Broad\n development of commercial banks. Reforms. Features of imperialism in. The\n emergence of monopolistic associations in industry. The influence of the\n city revolution on the Russian economy. Agrarian reform and its\n importance. The growth of banking monopolies and their association with\n industrial monopolies. Financial capital. Development of trade. The impact\n of World War I on the Russian economy. Change management industry.\n Military-industrial policy. System of special meetings. The food crisis.\n Violation of the functioning of the monetary system. The overthrow of\n tsarism and the economic policy of the provisional government. Crisis\n state of the economy. The economic backwardness of Germany. The germ of\n German industry in the villages. Prussian way of development of capitalism\n in agriculture. Industrial revolution in Germany. Accelerated creation of\n a military-industrial base. Features of the structure of foreign trade in\n Germany. Features of the origin of capitalism in Japan. Inclusion of Japan\n in the world economic system. The growth of industry and trade. Zaibatsu.\n Paternalism. State support of economic development. \u003cbr\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTheme\n 5. DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORLD ECONOMY ON THE ABROAD OF THE XIX AND XX\n CENTURIES\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e Technological progress of the last third of\n the XIX century. The emergence of new industries and the enlargement of\n industrial production. Establishment of joint-stock companies. Export of\n capital. Change in the industrial structure of industry. The emergence of\n new industries. Monopolization of the economies of the leading capitalist\n countries. Creation of industrial and banking monopolies. Education of\n financial capital. Cartels and syndicates as the main form of\n monopolization of the economy. Formation of the world market. Types of\n colonial farming. Features of immigrant colonies. Change in the system of\n exploitation of colonies. Monocultural nature of the economy. The birth of\n the national commercial bourgeoisie in the colonies and dependent\n countries. \u003cbr\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTheme 6. FORMATION OF REGULATED\n CAPITALISM\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e Impact of the First World War on the economy\n of leading foreign states. Economic growth in the US after the First World\n War. Formation of the \"consumer society\". Causes of the economic\n crisis. The period of the Great Depression in the United States. Falling\n production volumes. The ruin of banks, industrial companies and farms.\n \"New Deal\" by F. Roosevelt and his results. Keynesianism.\n Banking and financial reform. Public Works. Measures to combat\n overproduction of agricultural products. Change in the role of the state\n in the economy. Economic chaos in Germany after the First World War.\n Hyperinflation. The Dawes Plan. Stabilization of the German economy.\n Economic development of Germany in the years of the Weimar Republic. The\n impact of the global economic crisis on the German economy. Establishment\n of the fascist dictatorship. Militarization of the economy. Development of\n the military industry. Intervention of the state in the economy. Forced\n syndication. Expansion of the public sector of the economy. Preparing for\n war. \u003cbr\u003e\n \u003cstrong\u003eTheme 7. STATE SOCIALISM IN THE\n USSR\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e Socio-economic transformation of the\n Bolsheviks. Work control. Nationalization of industry and banks.\n Establishment of a monopoly of foreign trade. The agrarian policy of the\n Soviet government. The economy of the country during the civil war.\n Politics of War Communism. The GOELRO plan. Economics of the USSR during\n the NEP. Replacement of the surplus-deposit for the tax. Concessions.\n Monetary reform. Concentration of NEP. Forcing the pace of\n industrialization. Collectivization. Soviet economy during the first\n five-year plans. The economy of the country during the Great Patriotic War\n and in the period of post-war reconstruction. Economic development in the\n 60's and 80's. Economic reforms of the years. Results of the\n post-October development of the economy. Crisis of the\n administrative-command system. Slowdown in the growth rates of key\n economic indicators. \u003cbr\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTheme 8. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT\n OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN THE XX-TH CENTURY\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cbr\u003e Economic results of\n the Second World War. US leadership in the global economy. Marshall Plan.\n Strengthening state regulation of the economy. Scientific and\n technological revolution (STR) and structural changes in the economy of\n foreign countries. The economic policy of Charles de Gaulle in France.\n Social market economy and economic reforms of L. Erhard in Germany.\n Postwar industrial development of Japan. General regularities of the\n modern economy of foreign countries. Structural changes. A new quality of\n education and qualification of the workforce. The concept of \"human\n relations\". Reasons for changing the model of state regulation.\n Strengthening market principles in the economy. \"Reaganomics\"\n and its results. Economic reforms of the government of M. Thatcher.\n Features of economic development of Japan. New industrial countries.\n Growth of interdependence of national economies. Formation of a single\n world market. International economic integration. \u003cbr\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTheme\n 9. MAIN DIRECTIONS OF RUSSIAN ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT\u003c/strong\u003e\n \u003cbr\u003e The collapse of\n the USSR. Necessity of fundamental social and economic transformations.\n Economic reform in the conditions of the formation of an independent state\n - the Russian Federation. Liberalization of prices. Inflation.\n Privatization. Formation of diverse forms of ownership and organizational\n and legal forms of management. Formation of market infrastructure.\n Reforming of agriculture. Creation of financial and industrial groups.\n State budget deficit. The crisis of August 17, 1998. Default. The modern\n stage of economic reforms. Results of social and economic transformations:\n achievements and difficulties. Prospects for Russia's economic\n development. \u003cstrong\u003eREFERENCE LIST\u003c/strong\u003e\n Ashmarov I.A.  (2008)\n Economic institutions of the labour market. Voronezh: The scientific book.\n 240 p. Ashmarov\n I.A. (2009) History of Economics: Textbook for high schools. Dushanbe:\n Irfon. 336 p. Ashmarov I.A. (2009) On the methodology of historical\n and economic research / I.A. Ashmarov. // Historical and economic\n research. № 1  Pp. 149-158. Ashmarov I.A. (2018) On the Periodization of the Postwar\n Economic History of Japan. Historical and Economic Studies.  T. 19. № 1.\n Pp. - 121-132. Voshchanova G.P., Godzina G.S. (2001) History of the\n economy. Tutorial. Moscow. INFRA-M. 232 p. Guseynov R.M.  (1999) History of\n the Russian economy. Tutorial. Moscow. Publishing house YUKEA. 352\n p. Guseynov\n R.M.  (2014) Economic History: A Textbook for Bachelors. Yurayt Publishing\n House, 686 p. URL: http://urss.ru/PDF/add_en/181839-1.pdf (reference date:\n June 16, 2018) Ershov B.A. (2012) State legal regulation of the\n activities of the Russian Orthodox Church in the provinces of the Central\n Chernozem region in the XIX - early XX centuries. Historical,\n philosophical, political and legal sciences, culturology and art history.\n Questions of theory and practice. Part 2. №. 4.  Pp. 75-78.\n Ershov B.A. (2012)\n Historiographical aspects of the relationship between the Russian Orthodox\n Church and state structures in the provinces of the Central Chernozem\n region in the XIX - early XX centuries. Bulletin of the Voronezh State\n Technical University. Series \"Humanities\".  T. 8. №. 11. Pp.\n 188-192. Ershov\n B.A. (2013) Russian Orthodox Church in the structure of public\n administration in the XIX - early XX centuries: Monograph. Voronezh:\n \"Voronezh State Technical University\". 245 p. Ershov B.A., Ashmarov I.A.\n (2018) Historical dictionary of economics (data set) Figshare. 14\n p. Konotopov\n M.V., Smetanin S.I. (2007) History of the economy. Textbook for high\n schools. 2-nd ed. Academic Project. 368 p. Loyberg M.Y. (128) History of\n the economy. Tutorial.  INFRA-M. 128 p. Mertsalova L.A.  (1990) German\n fascism in the newest historiography of the FRG. Voronezh State\n University. 208 p. Kotov A.A. (2004) Dictionary-reference book on the\n history of the economy. Voronezh State Pedagogical University.  36\n p. Terne A.M.\n (1991) In the realm of Lenin: essays.  Publishing house\n \"Scythians\". 352 p. Khokhlov E.V. (2005) Military economy of the USSR on the\n eve and during the Second World War. Publishing House of the St.\n Petersburg University. 282 p. Dates on the history of Russia: chronology // URL:\n https://5-ege.ru/daty-po-istorii-rossii/ (reference date: June 16,\n 2018)","descriptionType":"Other"}],"geoLocations":[],"fundingReferences":[],"url":"https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.17916/P6F59M","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":20,"schemaVersion":"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4","source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":301,"downloadCount":32,"referenceCount":1,"citationCount":1,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2018-06-16T20:50:49Z","registered":"2018-06-16T20:50:50Z","published":null,"updated":"2026-01-27T18:38:03Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"dryad.dryad","type":"clients"}}}},{"id":"10.17916/p6qp4c","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p6qp4c","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"O'Connell, Elizabeth","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Elizabeth","familyName":"O'Connell","affiliation":["St. Francis Xavier University"],"nameIdentifiers":[{"schemeUri":"https://orcid.org","nameIdentifier":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8492-0183","nameIdentifierScheme":"ORCID"}]},{"name":"Risk, David","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"David","familyName":"Risk","affiliation":["St. Francis Xavier University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]},{"name":"Atherton, Emmaline","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Emmaline","familyName":"Atherton","affiliation":["St. Francis Xavier University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]},{"name":"Bourlon, Evelise","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Evelise","familyName":"Bourlon","affiliation":["St. Francis Xavier University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]},{"name":"Fougère, Chelsea","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Chelsea","familyName":"Fougère","affiliation":["St. Francis Xavier University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]},{"name":"Baillie, Jennifer","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Jennifer","familyName":"Baillie","affiliation":["St. Francis Xavier University"],"nameIdentifiers":[]},{"name":"Lowry, David","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"David","familyName":"Lowry","affiliation":["Royal Holloway University of London"],"nameIdentifiers":[]}],"titles":[{"title":"Methane emissions from contrasting production regions within Alberta, Canada: Implications under new federal methane regulations"}],"publisher":"Dryad","container":{},"publicationYear":2018,"subjects":[],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2018-11-01T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Issued"},{"date":"2018-11-01T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Available"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[{"relationType":"IsCitedBy","relatedIdentifier":"10.1525/elementa.341","relatedIdentifierType":"DOI"}],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["34860 bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"1","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","rightsIdentifier":"cc-by-4.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"Aggressive reductions of oil and gas sector methane, a potent greenhouse\n gas, have been proposed in Canada. Few large-scale measurement studies\n have been conducted to confirm a baseline. This study used a vehicle-based\n gas monitoring system to measure fugitive and vented gas emissions across\n Lloydminster (heavy oil), Peace River (heavy oil/bitumen), and Medicine\n Hat (conventional gas) developments in Alberta, Canada. Four gases (CO2,\n CH4, H2S, C2H6), and isotopic δ13CCH4 were recorded in real-time\n at 1 Hz over a six-week field campaign. A point-source gaussian plume\n dispersion model was used to quantify emissions rates. We sampled 1,299\n well pads, containing 2,670 unique wells and facilities, in triplicate.\n Geochemical emission signatures of fossil fuel-sourced plumes were\n identified and attributed to nearby, upwind oil and gas well pads.\n Emission occurrences and rates were highest in Lloydminster, where 40.8%\n of sampled well pads were estimated to be emitting methane-rich gas above\n our minimum detection limits (µ = 9.73 m3d-1). Of the well pads\n we found to be emitting in Lloydminster, an estimated 40.2% emitted above\n the threshold in which emissions mitigation under federal regulations\n would be required, suggesting government estimates of infrastructure\n affected by incoming regulations may be low. Comparing emission\n intensities with available Canadian-based research suggests good general\n agreement between studies, regardless of the measurement methodology used\n for detection and quantification. This study also demonstrates the\n effectiveness in applying a gaussian dispersion model to continuous\n mobile-sourced emissions data as a first-order leak detection and repair\n screening methodology for meeting regulatory compliance.  ","descriptionType":"Abstract"},{"description":"'Dataset S1. Infrastructure Heights' contains\n emission source heights used in the Gaussian Dispersion Model to calculate\n well pad emission rate averages. ","descriptionType":"Methods"}],"geoLocations":[],"fundingReferences":[{"funderName":"\n        Petroleum Technology Alliance of Canada (Alberta Upstream Petroleum\n        Research Fund)\n      "},{"funderName":"Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (Atlantic Innovation Fund)"}],"url":"https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.17916/P6QP4C","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":18,"schemaVersion":"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4","source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":219,"downloadCount":14,"referenceCount":0,"citationCount":1,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2018-05-29T19:17:00Z","registered":"2018-05-29T19:17:01Z","published":null,"updated":"2026-01-27T18:37:34Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"dryad.dryad","type":"clients"}}}},{"id":"10.17916/p6159w","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p6159w","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"Turchin, Peter","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Peter","familyName":"Turchin","affiliation":["University of Connecticut"],"nameIdentifiers":[]}],"titles":[{"title":"Fitting Dynamic Regression Models to Seshat Data - Supplemental Material"}],"publisher":"Dryad","container":{},"publicationYear":2018,"subjects":[],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2018-06-01T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Issued"},{"date":"2018-06-01T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Available"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[{"relationType":"IsCitedBy","relatedIdentifier":"10.21237/c7clio9137696","relatedIdentifierType":"DOI"}],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["1707607 bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"2","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","rightsIdentifier":"cc-by-4.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"This article presents a general statistical approach suitable for the\n analysis of time-resolved (time-series) cross-cultural data. The goal is\n to test theories about the evolutionary processes that generate cultural\n change. This approach allows us to investigate the effects of predictor\n variables (proxying for theory-suggested mechanisms), while controlling\n for spatial diffusion and autocorrelations due to shared cultural history\n (known as Galton’s Problem). It also fits autoregressive terms to account\n for serial correlations in the data and tests for nonlinear effects. I\n illustrate these ideas and methods with an analysis of processes that may\n influence the evolution of one component of social complexity, information\n systems, using the Seshat: Global History Databank.","descriptionType":"Abstract"}],"geoLocations":[],"fundingReferences":[],"url":"https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.17916/P6159W","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":17,"schemaVersion":"http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4","source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":395,"downloadCount":62,"referenceCount":0,"citationCount":1,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2018-05-21T23:03:12Z","registered":"2018-05-21T23:03:13Z","published":null,"updated":"2026-01-27T18:37:15Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"dryad.dryad","type":"clients"}}}},{"id":"10.17916/p6zw2v","type":"dois","attributes":{"doi":"10.17916/p6zw2v","identifiers":[],"creators":[{"name":"Ershov, Bogdan","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Bogdan","familyName":"Ershov","affiliation":["Voronezh State Technical University"],"nameIdentifiers":[{"schemeUri":"https://orcid.org","nameIdentifier":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-0350","nameIdentifierScheme":"ORCID"}]},{"name":"Ashmarov, Igor","nameType":"Personal","givenName":"Igor","familyName":"Ashmarov","affiliation":["Voronezh State Institute of Arts"],"nameIdentifiers":[]}],"titles":[{"title":"THE VALUE OF THE OBJECTS OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE FOR THE CITY\n      OF VORONEZH"}],"publisher":"UC Press","container":{},"publicationYear":2019,"subjects":[{"subject":"church"},{"subject":"architecture"},{"subject":"heritage"},{"subject":"Culture"},{"subject":"society."}],"contributors":[],"dates":[{"date":"2019-04-07T07:00:00Z","dateType":"Available"},{"date":"2019","dateType":"Issued"}],"language":"en","types":{"ris":"DATA","bibtex":"misc","citeproc":"dataset","schemaOrg":"Dataset","resourceType":"dataset","resourceTypeGeneral":"Dataset"},"relatedIdentifiers":[{"relationType":"Cites","relatedIdentifier":"https://dash.ucop.edu/stash/data_paper/doi:10.17916/p6zw2v","relatedIdentifierType":"DOI"}],"relatedItems":[],"sizes":["813991 bytes"],"formats":[],"version":"9","rightsList":[{"rights":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)","rightsUri":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"}],"descriptions":[{"description":"The article discusses the importance of objects of historical and cultural\n      heritage of Voronezh (Russia). Monuments of history and culture are an\n      important factor in the unity of the peoples of Russia, a means of\n      unification in times of crises and catastrophes. In this sense, it can be\n      argued that the Russian regional cultural heritage is a combination of the\n      best achievements of national cultures of different peoples of Russia.\n      Particular attention is paid to architectural buildings related to the\n      life of the Russian Orthodox Church, in particular, city churches, houses\n      of priests, office buildings, monuments of nature. All this historical and\n      cultural heritage raises the question not only about clarifying the role\n      and place of traditions, but also about the limited possibilities of using\n      historical experience. In this regard, the relevance of the study and\n      preservation of the cultural heritage of Voronezh is of particular value.","descriptionType":"Abstract"},{"description":"The study of Russian traditions of the protection of cultural heritage is\n      based on a systematic approach that follows from the methodological\n      principles of historical synergy. The National System for the Protection\n      of Cultural Heritage is a process of a complex, unstable, dynamic,\n      self-renewing approach to the system of protection of cultural heritage.\n      Considering this, the traditions of the protection of cultural heritage as\n      a system object were considered, firstly, through the structure of this\n      object - the state and public subsystems (how these elements of the system\n      are ordered, what hierarchy they form); secondly, through the functions of\n      the components of the system of parts (the role of the element, the extent\n      to which it is responsible for maintaining the stability of the system for\n      identifying, studying, preserving and using the objects of the national\n      cultural heritage, as well as its changes); thirdly, through the\n      characterization of cultural heritage as a constantly becoming more\n      complex information system, in which the protection of heritage appears,\n      first of all, as a choice of information about its past, which is socially\n      significant for a given historical period of time. Allocation of the most\n      significant processes in the preservation and transmission of historical\n      traditions was made possible through the use of the phenomenological\n      method, which allowed to reveal the inner essence of the objects of\n      cultural heritage and features of the gradations themselves.","descriptionType":"Methods"},{"description":"I. INTRODUCTION The collapse of the Soviet Union, the collapse of the\n      communist ideology put the modern Russian society in the conditions of the\n      search for new values and cultural landmarks, awareness of new boundaries\n      of their identity. In a society that is in a situation of split and\n      spiritual crisis, the mood of indifference and social apathy is growing\n      more and more rapidly, the ideas of national and religious exclusiveness\n      are spreading, social and national hatred is deepening, and aggression is\n      growing. Understanding the significance of the cultural component, the\n      role and place of cultural heritage both in substantiating historical\n      choices and in the process of cultural-historical self-identification of\n      Russian society is becoming more and more obvious in the context of an\n      increasingly open and sharp confrontation between supporters and opponents\n      of modern transformations in Russia. In modern conditions of existence and\n      functioning of the world cultural heritage system, a question arises about\n      the significance of the Russian experience in the protection of monuments.\n      This system focuses us on the use of European standards for the protection\n      of cultural heritage, which have already proven their effectiveness, which\n      are not always applicable to the realities of the transition state of\n      Russian society and are fraught with new losses of historical and cultural\n      monuments. II. DISCUSSION The first generalization of the experience of\n      the formation of Russian traditions of cultural heritage protection began\n      under Peter I, during this period the first steps were taken to find and\n      preserve Russian antiquities. A similar historiographical situation was\n      caused by a number of circumstances: the relatively late formation of the\n      most academic historical science in Russia; poor study of Russian\n      territories in order to identify objects of history and culture; unclear\n      selection criteria; In the stormy discussions that engulfed the educated\n      strata of Russian society, the negativity in relation to the national\n      cultural heritage of numerous historical and philosophical scientific\n      societies has been overcome. A whole galaxy of specialists was prepared\n      who, based on their own practical experience of participating in memorial\n      defense activities, could formulate their immediate problems. After\n      October 1917, there was an ideologization and the establishment of a party\n      monopoly in state policy in the field of culture and the protection of\n      cultural heritage. The Soviet concept of preserving monuments, established\n      with the coming of the Bolsheviks to power, suggested that the\n      overwhelming majority of monuments, as a product of the “cursed past” and\n      the result of the activities of the exploiting classes, should not be\n      preserved. Only the “monuments of revolutionary achievements”, “monuments\n      of national life” and “monuments of the Red Army” became the object of the\n      preservation activity. This approach is reflected in the work of M.G.\n      Khudyakova “Pre-Revolutionary Russian Archeology in the Service of the\n      Exploiting Classes”, as well as in a number of “ideologically sustained”\n      articles of the 1920s – 1930s gm. In the USSR, after a long break in the\n      late 1960s. the social movement for the protection of monuments was\n      resumed, the All-Russian Society for the Protection of Monuments of\n      History and Culture was created (1965), which immediately launched a broad\n      scientific and publishing activity. Since 1972, the annual collection of\n      articles “Monuments of the Fatherland” began to be published, and since\n      1980, two times a year, the eponymous thematic Almanac of the All-Russian\n      Society for the Preservation of Historical and Cultural Monuments (The\n      World of Russian Estate, Monastic Revolution shrines of Moscow \").\n      Having given a fairly complete picture of the historical experience of the\n      Russian state in the field of the protection of cultural heritage in\n      pre-revolutionary Russia, the author as a whole did not exhaust this\n      topic. Outside the scope of the study, there remained the state solution\n      to the problems of preserving movable monuments of history and culture,\n      activities in the field of protecting monuments of individual statesmen\n      and the scientific community, comparing Russian historical experience of\n      protecting monuments of history and culture with the experience\n      accumulated by foreign countries in the same period. III. RESULTS Special\n      attention is attracted by the idea of forming protected historical and\n      cultural territories, which can be historical cities, manor and monastery\n      complexes, fields of historical battles, historical roads, historical\n      production territories, etc. Such territories are already being created\n      either in the form of museum reserves or other spatial entities, including\n      specific administrative and territorial units (regions). Sometimes their\n      activities can determine the future economic specialization of the region\n      as a whole, the prospects for its socio-economic development. Heritage\n      monuments are gradually recognized as a specific resource of the territory\n      and act as a new active phenomenon of economic life. In recent years, the\n      historical heritage is being evaluated in a new way, many previously\n      forgotten names and historical events are being returned, religious\n      monuments and shrines are being restored. For example, in Voronezh and the\n      Voronezh region out of 2,730 objects of historical and cultural heritage\n      of 260 churches (about 10%), which are located mainly in provincial\n      counties (districts). This is a very important and reliable historical\n      fact. This fact deserves the attention of historians and specialists in\n      the field of culture. In fact, these are really monuments of regional\n      significance, but there are also monuments of the federal level. In\n      Voronezh, the Jewish Synagogue appeared only at the beginning of the 20th\n      century; the Lutheran church appeared already in the first quarter of the\n      19th century. Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Judaism were the most common\n      religions in this period.                                                 \n                                Photo № 1   Church of the Prophet Samuel in the\n      city in Voronezh        Photo № 2 Nikolskaya Church in Voronezh  \n                                                              Photo № 3\n      Pokrovskaya Church of the city in Voronezh         Photo № 4\n       Alexievo-Akatov Monastery in Voronezh            \n                                                                                                                    A significant factor in the life of the regions of Russia was the emergence of a significant number of publications on history, local history, the study of the nature of the native land (these are reprints of old editions, as well as the publication of unpublished manuscripts, and the appearance of new regional studies). Of particular importance was the concept of “heritage”, which was almost never used a decade and a half ago.     Among the main trends of the post-Soviet period, there is a noticeable transition from the protection of individual monuments to the preservation of the entire natural and cultural heritage in its integrity, which covers both the heritage objects themselves and the environment in which they exist. This includes efforts to identify the entire heritage, encompassing not only outstanding monuments of nature, history and culture, but also other important elements: folk culture, traditions, crafts and handicrafts, historical urban environment, rural development and settlement system, ethnocultural environment, Natural resources. environment, etc. All these phenomena are considered as an immediate and integral part of the national cultural heritage, as special elements determining the identity of the culture of a country or its region. A similar trend is actively developing among the monuments of nature, history and culture. Work on the inventory of monuments in various regions of the country has expanded the existing lists of many new objects. They included not only outstanding monuments of architecture, history, monumental art, but also numerous architectural structures of the late XIX - early XX century. Special attention is paid to the unity of the architectural or historical ensemble.                      Photo № 5   Vvedenskaya Church in Voronezh           Photo № 6   Uspenskaya Church in Voronezh                    Photo № 7   Voronezhsky Church Seminary          Photo № 8  The Modern Building of the Voronezh Seminary Foto № 9  Siberian larch, Russia Voronezh In 1938, 4 seedlings of Siberian larch were planted on a land plot in the city of Voronezh at the address: Mechnikov lane house № 22.  In 1941 the Great Patriotic war began. German troops captured the city of Voronezh. In 1943, the city of Voronezh was liberated from Nazi invaders. The front line passed near the house on Mechnikov lane, 22. German tanks, passing through this land, destroyed three larch. The only tree (pictured above) has survived to the present day and is a valuable example of the mother's seed, as well as a silent witness to the fierce fighting for the city of Voronezh. Siberian larch has been the national tree of Russia since 1960. Represents Russia in peoples ' Friendship Park (Seattle, USA). Larch is a symbol of longevity and rebirth. In 2015, the tree was examined by the specialists of the Botanical garden named after Professor B. M. Kozo-Polyansky, Voronezh state University (Director of the Botanical garden of Voronezh state University, candidate of agricultural Sciences, associate Professor of the Department of ecology A. A. Voronin, the scientific employee of the Botanical garden of Voronezh state University, candidate of geographical Sciences L. A. Lepeshkina, researcher at the Botanical garden of Voronezh state University, candidate of geographical Sciences, associate Professor M. A. Klevtsova). Certification materials in 2015 (currently 81-year-old Siberian larch) were sent by specialists to the national register of forest stands of the all-Russian program \"Trees-monuments of nature\". According to the results of the attestation Commission, unique trees are given the status of a state-protected natural object. Another important area of modern cultural development is the formation of a system of historical and cultural territories. This new trend in cultural policy suggests a territorial approach to the preservation of heritage. The international community has long paid attention to the state of its cultural heritage and preserves the unique territories of the natural environment. In addition to the adoption of national lists of the most valuable and protected objects in the second half of the XX century. The task was to preserve and render assistance to cultural monuments and natural territories within the framework of interstate programs. Since 1972, the World Heritage List has become a kind of universal heritage registry drawn up within the framework of the UNESCO International Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.   BELOW IS A TABLE, WHICH CONTAINS ALMOST ALL THE OBJECTS OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE CITY OF VORONEZH (as at 03/05/2018) Voronezh city, Russian Federation № Item number The Name of the Monument of History Dating of the Monument Security category Document of acceptance for state security Number in United State Register of Cultural Heritage Objects  (EGROKN) Address   Skuratova's House (Dom Skuratovoy) XIX Region-al № 510 361410059490005 31, Aviatsionnaya Street     Manor, where the statistician Voronov lived (Usad'ba, gde zhil statistik Voronov) а) outhouse (fligel') б) Residential house (Dom zhiloj)   XIX   Regional № 510 № 472   37, Aviatsionnaya Street   39, Aviatsionnaya Street     M.N. Zamyatnin’s House (Dom M.N. Zamyatnina) 1913 Regional № 246 361410302520005 12, Alekseevskogo Street   Merchant Lagutin's House (Dom kuptsa Lagutina) 1912 Regional № 510 361410061010005 24, Alekseevskogo Street   Karpinskaya’s House (Dom Karpinskoy) XIX Regional № 510 361710909830005 16, Baturinskaya Street   Veterinarian Verevkin's Manor (Usad'ba veterinara Verevkina) а) Residential house (Dom zhiloj) б) outhouse (fligel')   XVIII-XIX Regional № 246 № 246 361420063790005 361410063790015 361410063790025 18, Baturinskaya Street 20, Baturinskaya Street   Vandalovsky’s Outbuilding (Fligel' Vandalovskogo) 1889 Regional № 510 361510398300005 29, Baturinskaya Street   Architect Baranov’s House (Dom arkhitektora Baranova) 1895 Regional № 472 361410059670005 34, Baturinskaya Street   Architect I.N. Afanasyev’s Outbuilding  (Fligel' arkhitektora I.N. Afanas'yeva) XIX Regional № 510 361410058640005 35, Baturinskaya Street   Pokatilova’s House (Dom Pokatilovoy) XIX Regional № 219 361510318850005 40, Baturinskaya Street   Firyupkin's House (Dom Firyupkina) 1915 Regional № 510 361410058930005 39, Baumansky Lane   Ivanovskaya’s House (Dom Ivanovskoy) 1911 Regional № 219 361410059630005 5, Bekhtereva Street   Kargashin's House  (Dom Kargashina) 1911 Regional № 510 361410324500005 16, Bekhtereva Street   Ensemble of the Intercession Church (Ansambl' Pokrovskoy tserkvi) а) Church of the Intercession (Pokrovskaya tserkov') б) House of the Intercession Church (Dom Pokrovskoy tserkvi)   1736-1841, XIX Federal № 176 361420083640006     38, Bekhtereva Street 36, Bekhtereva Street   Barracks named Rajewski (Kazarma imeni Rayevskogo) 1911-1913 Regional № 472 361410049140005 13, Bol'shaya  Manezhnaya Street   Suvorkina’s House (Dom Suvorkinoy) XIX Regional № 510 361510398250005 104, Bolshaya Streletskaya Street   The house in which the Council of Workers' Deputies met in 1905 (Dom, v kotorom v 1905 g. zasedal Sovet rabochikh deputatov) XVIII Federal № 624   2/4, Vaytsehovskogo Street   Zemstvo’s Shelter (Priyut zemskiy) 1911 Regional № 510   2/5, Vaytsehovskogo Street   Production complex (Proizvodstvennyy kompleks)       XVIII-XIX Regional № 219   The Territory in a residential area near Vaytsehovskogo Street     Pimenov's Outbuilding (Fligel' Pimenova) 1913 Regional № 510 361410058420005 6а, Vaytsehovskogo Street   The House in which V.V. Mayakovsky met with poets (Dom, v kotorom V.V. Mayakovskiy vstrechalsya s poetami) XX Regional № 219   7, Vaytsehovskogo Street   Shchukina’s House (Dom Shchukinoy) 1899 Regional № 472 361510312510005 9, Vaytsehovskogo Street   Specialized School of Shpolsky (Uchilishche Shpol'skogo) 1913 Regional № 510 361410058570005 60, Volodarskogo Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) 1928 Regional № 510 361410058920005 39, Voykova Street   Arno’s House (Dom Arno) XIX Regional № 510 361410057270005 16, Gertsena Street   Dorokhin's House (Dom Dorohina) 1906 Regional № 510 361410398350005 19, Maxim Gorki Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XX Regional № 510 361410057290005 22, 20-Letiya VLKSM Street     The Grevtsov Brothers' House (Dom brat'ev Grevcovyh) XIX Regional № 510 391210004630005 35, 20-Letiya VLKSM Street     The \"Ark\" House (Dom \"Kovcheg\") XVIII Regional № 246   37, 20-Letiya VLKSM Street     Snopov’s Manor (3 buildings) Usad'ba Snopova (3 zdaniya) XIX Regional № 219 361520398280005 40a, 20-Letiya VLKSM Street     Vartanov's House (Dom Vartanova) 1913 Regional № 510 361410057300005 48, 20-Letiya VLKSM Street     Residential House of Belovykh (Zhiloy dom Belovykh) XIX Regional № 510 361410058940005 17, 25-go Oktyabrya Street   The building of the Bogoyavlenskaya (Epiphany) Church (Zdaniye Bogoyavlenskoy tserkvi) 1763 Regional № 246 361410060850005 17а, 25-go Oktyabrya Street   Dolskaya’s House (Dom Dol'skoy) XIX - ХХ Regional № 510 361410057490005 21, 25-go Oktyabrya Street   Voronezh Civil Engineering Institute (Voronezhskiy inzhenerno-stroitel'nyy institut) 1930 Regional № 246 36140063580005 84, 20 let Oktyabrya Street   Eliseev’s Manor (2 buildings) (Usad'ba Yeliseyeva (2 zdaniya)): а) House б) Outhouse   XIX XIX Regional № 219 № 510 361420063780005     37, 9 Yanvarya Street 35, 9 Yanvarya Street   Merchant's house (Dom kupecheskiy) XIX - XX Regional № 219   41, 9 Yanvarya Street   Kharin's House (Dom Kharina) 1880 Regional № 219 361410398360005 43, 9 Yanvarya Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XX Regional № 510 361410056850005 52, 9 Yanvarya Street   Manuylov's House (Dom Manuylova) 1910 Regional № 510 361410056840005 3, Dzerzhinskogo Street   Ter-Panosov's House (Dom Ter-Panosova) 1912 Regional № 472 361410058950005 4, Dzerzhinskogo Street   Kharin's House (Dom Kharina) 1914 Regional № 472 361410058960005 6, Dzerzhinskogo Street   Shvedchenko’s House (Dom Shvedchenko) XX Regional № 510 361410059570005 16, Dzerzhinskogo Street   Cemetery Ternovoye (Ternovoye kladbishche) XVIII Regional № 472   The Territory between Dzinkovskogo and Malo-Ternovoy Streets   Church of the Nativity (Tserkov' Rozhdestva Khristova) 1856 Regional № 71-01-07/47 361710909900005 51, Dimitrova Street   Savings and Loan’s Association (Ssudo-sberegatel'noye tovarishchestvo) 1916 Regional № 472 361410758820005 81, Dimitrova Street   The house in which in 1901 - 1915 the creator of the genre of publicistic clownery A.L. Durov lived (Dom, v kotorom v 1901 - 1915 zhil sozdatel' zhanra publitsisticheskoy klounady A.L. Durov) XX Federal № 624 361410056930006 2, Durova Street   The Dyomins' House (Dom Dyominyh) XIX Region-al № 472 361410056920005 7, Zubrilova Street   City Women's Shelter (Gorodskoy zhenskiy priyut) 1912 Region-al № 472 361410059230005 19, Kalyaeva Street   The Assumption Church (Tserkov' Uspeniya) 1694 Federal № 1327   2, K. Marksa Street   Firehouse building (Zdaniye pozharnoy chasti) 1825-1875 Regional № 246 361410063650005 32, K. Marksa Street   Klochkov’s House (Dom Klochkova) XIX Regional № 219   35, K. Marksa Street   Kryazhov’s House (Dom Kryazhova) XIX Regional № 219 361410302780005 41, K. Marksa Street     The architect Volkov's House (Dom arkhitektora Volkova) XVIII Regional № 472   43, K. Marksa Street   A Stone Bridge (Kamennyy most) 1826 Regional № 246 361410062340005 K. Marksa Street   Alexandrinsky orphanage (Aleksandrinskiy detskiy priyut) XIX Regional № 219 361410056880005 45, K. Marksa Street   Gerasimov's Manor (Usad'ba Gerasimova): а) House б) Gerasimovs’ Outhouse     XIX-ХХ 1905 Regional № 219 № 510 361420064780005   48, 48б, K. Marksa Street   Belousovs’ House (Dom Belousovyh) XX Regional № 219 361410332320005 51, K. Marksa Street   The Doctor S.V. Martynov’s House (Dom vracha S.V. Martynova) XIX Federal № 624 361510304480006 55, K. Marksa Street   Reznikova’s Residential House (Dom zhiloy Reznikovoy) 1911 Region-al № 219 361710909910005 58, K. Marksa Street     Lutheran Church (Lyuteranskaya kirkha) 1819 Federal № 176 361410049050006 65, K. Marksa Street   Stoll’s Factory (3 buildings) (Zavod Stollya (3 zdaniya)): - administrative building - industrial building - industrial building     1915-1916 XIX 1907-1911 Regional № 246   67/Е, K. Marksa Street ,   67/З1, K. Marksa Street, 67/З1, З3, K. Marksa Street     Shuklins’ House (Dom Shuklinykh) 1902-1903 Regional № 219 361410062460005 70, K. Marksa Street   Somov’s House where lived S.Ya. Marshak (Dom Somova) 1913 Regional № 246 361510318870005 72, K. Marksa Street   Chernozubova’s Real School (Real'noye uchilishche Chernozubovoy) XIX, 1911 Regional № 472   82, K. Marksa Street   Zastavsky pylon (Zastavskiy pilon) XVIII Regional № 219 361510398430005   K. Marksa Street (near school)     Hospital (Bol'nitsa) XX Regional № 510 361410060890005 11, Kol'tsovskaya Street   Complex of State Wine Warehouse (Kompleks kazennogo vinnogo sklada) 1900 Regional № 219   24, Kol'tsovskaya Street   The Complex of the Bell Factory of Samofalovs’ Merchants (Kompleks kolokol'nogo zavoda kuptsov Samofalovykh) XIX, 1904 Regional № 219 361510398580005 40, Kol'tsovskaya Street   Tomilin’s Manor (2 buildings): Usad'ba Tomilina (2 zdaniya): - House - Outhouse 1910 Regional № 510 361510398590005   60/1, Kol'tsovskaya Street   Boldyrev's Outbuilding (Fligel Boldyreva) 1912 Regional № 510 361410065490005 2, Komissarzhevskoy Street   Stepantsova’s  Grammar School (Gimnaziya Stepantsovoy) 1900-1901 Regional № 472 361510398510005 3, Komissarzhevskoy Street   House of the society of tenants-owners (Dom obshchestva kvartirantov-sobstvennikov) 1915 Regional № 510 361410065400005 4, Komissarzhevskoy Street   The house where the writer Zadonsky, architect Troitsky lived (Dom, v kotorom zhil pisatel' Zadon-skiy, arkhitektor Troitskiy) 1940 Regional № 246 361410065340005 6а, Komissarzhevskoy Street   The house where Massalitinov lived (Dom, v kotorom zhil Massalitinov) 1959-1979 Regional № 246 361510398530005 16, Komissarzhevskoy Street   Higher Primary School (Vyssheye nachal'noye uchilishche) 1895 Regional № 472 361510398560005 17, Komissarzhevskoy Street   Commercial School (Kommercheskoye uchilishche) 1915 Regional № 219 391210004690005 36, Kommunarov Street   Pharmacy Warehouse of the military department (2 buildings) (Aptechnyy sklad voyennogo vedomstva (2 zdaniya)) XX Regional № 510 361420104230005 361410104230025 41, Kommunarov Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XIX – XX Regional № 219 361410065590005   44, Kommunarov Street   Fedorov’s House (Dom Fedorova) XIX – XX Regional № 510 361410120470005 60, Kommunarov Street   Barracks \"Yubileynaya\" (Kazarma \"Yubileynaya\") 1910-1912 Regional № 472 361410068080005 19, Krasnoarmeyskaya   Romanovskaya Sloboda Officer Club’s Building (Zdaniye Ofitserskogo kluba Romanovskoy slobody) 1910 Regional № 71-01-07/42 361710909840005 105, Krasnoznamennaya Street   Outhouse for squadron commanders of Romanovskaya Sloboda (western) (Fligel' dlya eskadronnykh komandirov Romanovskoy slobody (zapadnyy)) 1910 Regional № 71-01-07/43 361710909850005 107, Krasnoznamennaya Street   The ensemble of residential buildings for the Romanovskaya Sloboda’s officers (Ansambl' zhilykh domov dlya ofitserov Romanovskoy slobody): 1. Dom rotnykh komandirov Romanovskoy slobody (trekhetazhnyy) 2. Fligel' dlya eskadronnykh komandirov Romanovskoy slobody (dvukhetazhnyy) 3. Zhiloy dom dlya ofitserov Chizhovskoy slobody (trekhetazhnyy) 4. Dom rotnykh komandirov Chizhovskoy slobody 5. Zhiloy dom dlya ofitserov Chizhovskoy slobody (dvukhetazhnyy) 6. Zhiloy fligel' dlya ofitserov Chizhovskoy slobody (dvukhetazhnyy) 7. Zhiloy dom dlya ofitserov Chizhovskoy slobody (dvukhetazhnyy) 1910-1914 Regional № 71-01-07/45   111, 113, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, Krasnoznamennaya Street     The Romanovskaya Sloboda’s Battalion Corps (Batal'onnyy korpus Romanovskoy slobody) 1910 Regional № 71-01-07/46 361710909880005 167, Krasnoznamennaya Street   Inn yard with Vikulov's Lavka (small shop) (Postoyalyy dvor s lavkoy Vikulova) XVIII Regional № 472 361410068040005 7, Kukolkina Street   Balashov’s House (Dom Balashova) XIX Regional № 510 361410067620005 18а, Kukolkina Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XIX-ХХ Regional № 510   25, Kutsygina Street   Commercial Bank (Bank kommercheskiy) 1880 Regional № 246 361410112540005 11, Lenin Square   Cinema \"Taumatograf\" (Kinoteatr \"Taumatograf\") 1900 Regional № 472   11а, Lenin Square   Cinema \"Ampir\" (Kinoteatr \"Ampir\") On October 29, 1917, a citywide rally of revolutionary workers and soldiers of the garrison, at which the appeal of an armed uprising was adopted, was held there. 1913 Regional № 219 361410048570005 13, Lenin Square   Pedagogical Institute (Pedagogicheskiy institut) 1950 Regional № 246 361410098670005 86, Lenina Street   Gausman's Factory. Here in 1905, meetings of workers at the plant were held. (Zavod Gausmana) XX Regional № 246 361410047070005   96, Lenina Street   Egorov’s House  (Dom Yegorova) XIX-ХХ Regional № 510 361410112930005 110, Lenina Street   The Assumption Church (Tserkov' Uspenskaya) 1848 Regional № 472   39а, Leninsky Prospect   Student’s Hostel (Obshchezhitiye studencheskoye) 1930 Regional № 71-01-07/41   94, Lomonosova Street   Corps of the State Research Institute of Colloid Chemistry (Korpus gosudarstvennogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta kolloidnoy khimii) 1910 Regional № 71-01-07/42   100, Lomonosova Street   The Trinity Church House (Dom Troitskoy tserkvi) XIX Regional № 510 36141022046000 9, Malo-Ternovaya Street   The poet A.V. Koltsov’s Tomb (1809-1842) (Mogila poeta A.V. Kol'tsova) 1842 Federal № 1327   Moiseyeva Street, literary necropolis   The poet I.S. Nikitin’s Tomb (1824-1861) (Mogila poeta I.S. Nikitina) 1863 Federal № 1327   Moiseyeva Street, literary necropolis   Guest house of Mitrofanovsky monastery (Strannopriimnyy dom Mitrofanovskogo monastyrya) 1850 Regional № 510   8а, Narvskaya Street   Public meeting building (Zdaniye obshchestvennogo sobraniya) 1908 Regional № 246   1, Nikitinskaya Street   Plotnikov’s Manor (Usad'ba Plotnikova) а) house, two outbuildings b) outhouse and service of the Plotnikov’s estate XIX Regional № 219, № 510 361420065610005 361410067300005 2, 4, Nikitinskaya Street     Ivanova’s Residential Estate House (Dom zhiloy usad'by Ivanovoy) 1911 Regional № 246 361410067710005 3, Nikitinskaya Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) 1908 Regional № 246 361410062710005 5, Nikitinskaya Street   Nechaevskaya school (Nechayevskaya shkola) 1895-1897 Regional № 246 361510303310005 9, Nikitinskaya Street   Strizhevskiy's Manor (Usad'ba Strizhevskogo) 1870 Regional № 219   14а, Nikitinskaya Street   I.S. Nikitin’s House (1846-1861) (Dom Ivana Savvicha Nikitina) XIX, 1955 Federal № 1327   19а, Nikitinskaya Street   House of the Lutheran community (Dom Lyuteranskoy obshchiny) XIX Regional № 219   20, Nikitinskaya Street   Tyurin’s House (Dom Tyurinykh) XIX Regional № 246 361410058000005 22, Nikitinskaya Street   Kligman’s House (Dom Kligmana) 1912 Regional № 246 361410127250005 29, Nikitinskaya Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) 1880 Regional № 246 361410062470005 32, Nikitinskaya Street   The complex of two Klochkovy’s estates (7 buildings) Kompleks dvukh usadeb Klochkovykh (7 zdaniy) XIX, 1905 Regional № 219, № 510 361520405040005 39, 41, 41/2; 43, Nikitinskaya Street   Titov’s Residential House (Dom zhiloy Titovykh) XIX Regional № 219 361410138470005 42, Nikitinskaya Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XIX Regional № 510 361410114240005 45, Nikitinskaya Street   Engineer Geger’s Outhouse (Fligel' inzhenera Gegera) 1911 Regional № 510   49/2, Nikitinskaya Street   Klotchkov’s House (Dom Klochkovykh) XIX Regional № 510   52/1, , Nikitinskaya Street   Church and Bell Tower of the Alekseevsky Akatov Monastery (Tserkov' i kolokol'nya Alekseyevskogo Akatova monastyrya) 1674-1881 Federal № 1327   1v, Osvobozhdeniya Truda Street   Troitsky Manor (Usad'ba Troitskikh) XIX Regional № 510 361420115220005 361410115220025 7, 7b, Osvobozhdeniya Truda Street   Factory buildings (2 houses) Fabrichnyye zdaniya (2 doma) XIX Regional № 219 361410115540005 8, Osvobozhdeniya Truda Street   Golovin's House (Dom Golovina) XIX Regional № 510 361410115770005 9, Osvobozhdeniya Truda Street   Vvedenskaya church (Vvedenskaya tserkov') 1770 Federal № 624   20, Osvobozhdeniya Truda Street   House and the Gate (Dom i vorota) XVIII - XIX Region-al № 219 361410115660005 20а, Osvobozhdeniya Truda Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XX Region-al № 510 361410115980005 17а, Ordzhonikidze Street   Voskresenskaya Church (Voskresenskaya tserkov') XVIII Federal № 176 361510239230006   19а / 19b, Ordzhonikidze Street   Drawing School named after Ponomarevs / Buchkuri Workshops (Risoval'naya shkola imeni Ponomarevykh / Masterskiye Buchkuri) 1914 Regional № 246 361410064150005 26, Ordzhonikidze Street   Noble and Peasant Bank (Dvoryanskiy i krest'yanskiy bank) 1911 Regional № 472 361510201110005 41, Ordzhonikidze Street   The house where I.N. Basilevsky (Ismail Karagandinsky) lived (1930-1940) (Dom, v kotorom zhil I.N. Bazilevskiy (Izmail Karagandinskiy) (1930-1940)) XIX Regional № 71-01-07/39   10, Pervomayskaya Street   House of the Uspenskaya Church (Dom Uspenskoy tserkvi) XIX Regional № 510 361410060500005 37а, Sof'i Perovskoy Street   Hotel complex \"Kiev Courtyard\" (Kompleks gostinitsy \"Kiyevskoye podvor'ye\") 1870 1906 1890 Regional № 219   361420119050005 361410119050015 1, 3, 3а, Platonov Street     E.N. Denisenko’s House, where was the Russian writer L.N. Tolstoy (Dom Ye.N. Denisenko, gde byl russkiy pisatel' L.N. Tolstoy) 1901 Regional № 246 361410564570005 5, Platonov Street   Bystrzhinsky Manor (Usad'ba Bystrzhinskikh): а) Bystrzhinsky’s Residential House b) Bystrzhinsky’s outhouse XIX Regional № 219   9, 11, Platonov Street     Kovyryalova's House (Dom Kovyryalovoy) 1912 Regional № 510 361410118480005 16, Platonov Street   Building of the Meshchanskaya Board (Zdaniye Meshchanskoy upravy) XVIII Regional № 1327   3, Plekhanovskaya Street   Volga-Kama Bank (Volzhsko-Kamskiy bank) 1914-1915 Region-al № 472 361410119090005 10, Plekhanovskaya Street   Vyakhireva's House (Dom Vyakhirevoy) 1904 Regional № 246 361410061020005 16, Plekhanovskaya Street   School of the Blind, 1895-1902 (Shkola slepykh, 1895-1902) XX Regional № 219 36110118660005 29, Plekhanovskaya Street   Philistine Miller's House (Dom meshchanina Millera) 1915-1916 Regional № 510 361410120870005 5, Sukonovka Pravaya Street   Artists Parenago’s House (Dom deyateley kul'tury Parenago) XIX Regional № 510 361410119610005 56, Proletarskaya Street   Fedorov’s House (Dom Fodorova) 1911 Regional № 219 361410120470005 10, Pushkinskaya Street   Protasova’s House (Dom Protasovoy) XIX Regional № 219 361510220470005 12, Pushkinskaya Street   Mikhailov’s House (Dom Mikhaylova) XIX Regional № 246 361410049710005 14, Pushkinskaya Street   School House (Uchilishchnyy dom) 1908-1909 Regional № 472 361410121330005 16, Pushkinskaya Street   Bezrukov’s House (Dom Bezrukova) XIX Regional № 219 361410120020005 20, Pushkinskaya Street   Klochkov's Residential House (Zhiloy dom Klochkova) XIX Regional № 219 361410060940005 26, Pushkinskaya Street   Bereznikov’s House (Dom Bereznikova) 1913 Regional № 510 361410121410005 24, Pyatnitskogo Street   Drugstore (Apteka) 1900 Regional № 472 361510197500005 30, Pyatnitskogo Street   The merchant Khalturin’s Manor (Usad'ba kuptsa Khalturina): а) Khalturin’s Manor House b) Outhouse of Khalturin's estate 1890 1883 Regional № 472   361520219590005 361410121830015 361410219590025 42, 42а, Pyatnitskogo Street   Deminy's House (Dom zhiloy Deminykh) XIX Regional № 510   49, Pyatnitskogo Street   Romensky’s Residential House (Zhiloy dom Romenskogo) XIX Regional № 510 361510318890005 54, Pyatnitskogo Street   Lazarenkov's House (Dom zhiloy Lazarenkova) 1881, 1902 Regional № 510 361410220230005 55, Pyatnitskogo Street   Glushchenko’s Manor (Usad'ba Glushchenko) а) House b) Outhouse 1903, 1911 Regional № 510 361420123430005 69, Pyatnitskogo Street   The complex of the Pokrovsky Monastery: а) cells (kel'i) b) Pechersk church (Pecherskaya cerkov') c) outbuilding (sluzhby) d) Abbess’s House (It was visited by the poet Zhukovsky)   XIX 1835   XIX   XIX Regional   № 510   № 510   № 510   № 510 361520328970005 Rabochiy gorodok Street 27, 59, Rabochiy gorodok Street 30, Rabochiy gorodok Street 32, 36, Rabochiy gorodok Street 34, Rabochiy gorodok Street   Alexandro-Mariinsky’ Eye Hospital (Aleksandro-Mariinskaya glaznaya lechebnitsa) 1911 Regional № 219 361510309120005 22, Revolyutsii 1905 goda Street   Mikhailov’s Outhouse / Residential Building (Fligel' Mikhaylova / zhiloy dom rabochikh zavoda) 1873 Regional № 510 361510399930005   33, Revolyutsii 1905 goda Street   Pervomayskiy Garden. Place of formation of the 1st Communist Regiment in Voronezh (Pervomayskiy sad. Mesto formirovaniya 1-go Kommunisticheskogo polka v Voronezhe) XIX, 1941 Regional № 246   Revolution Avenue, Pervomayskiy garden   A. Germanovskaya’ Manor / The house where I.A. Bunin was born (Usad'ba A. Germanovskoy) XIX Regional № 219   3, Revolution Avenue (prospekt Revolyutsii)   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) 1888-1890 Regional № 246 361410061000005 7, Revolution Avenue (prospekt Revolyutsii)   Secondary Technical School named after Peter I (Srednetekhnicheskoye uchilishche imeni Petra I) 1900 Regional № 510 361410126340005 8, Revolution Avenue (prospekt Revolyutsii)   The complex of buildings of the provincial district hospital with a home church (3 buildings) (Kompleks zdaniy gubernskoy zemskoy bol'nitsy s domovoy tserkov'yu (3 zdaniya)): а) Main building (hospital) b) Outbuilding c) Outbuilding d) Part of the provincial hospital complex XIX Regional № 246, № 510   10, 12, 14, Revolution Avenue (prospekt Revolyutsii)     1-d, Koltsovskaya Street     Department of South-Eastern Railway (Upravleniye YUVZHD) 1930-50 Regional № 472 361410131980005 18, Revolution Avenue   Travel Palace Building (Zdaniye Putevogo dvortsa) XVIII Federal № 1327 361510290470006 18/Е, Revolution Avenue   Building 1 of Man's Gymnasium (Zdaniye 1 muzhskoy gimnazii) 1859 Federal № 624 361410132360006 19, Revolution Avenue (prospekt Revolyutsii)   The building of the Treasury Chamber (Zdaniye Kazennoy palaty) 1787 Federal № 176 361410130990006   21, Revolution Avenue   House of People’s Organizations / (Governor’s House) (Dom narodnykh organizatsiy (Dom gubernatora)) 1780 Regional № 246 361410133570005 22, Revolution Avenue   Provincial government (Gubernskoye pravleniye) 1788-1859 Regional № 246 361410133340005 23, Revolution Avenue   Theological School (Dukhovnoye uchilishche) 1880 Regional № 472 361410133700005 24, Revolution Avenue   Provincial Post Office (Gubernskaya pochtovaya kontora) XIX Regional № 472 361510405030005 25, Revolution Avenue   Shvanvich’s Hotel (Gostinitsa Shvanvicha) 1840 Regional № 246 361410138570005 27, Revolution Avenue   Theological Seminary Building (Zdaniye dukhovnoy seminarii) XIX Regional № 246 361410133840005 29, Revolution Avenue   Tulinov-Boldyrev's House (Dom Tulinova-Boldyreva) XIX Federal № 1327 361410309220006 30, Revolution Avenue   Mariinsky Gymnasium (Mariinskaya gimnaziya) 1875 Regional № 246 361410132900005 32, Revolution Avenue   Book House (Dom knigi) 1935 Regional № 246 361410134240005 33, Revolution Avenue   Kapkanshchikov's House (Dom Kapkanshchikova) XIX Regional № 246 361410128650005 37, Revolution Avenue   Somov’s House, where the writer A.P. Platonov worked at the editorial office of the newspaper \"Voronezh Commune\" (Dom Somova, gde v redaktsii gazety «Voronezhskaya kommuna» rabotal A.P. Platonov) 1913 Regional № 510   39, Revolution Avenue   The building of the music school (Zdaniye muzykal'nogo uchilishcha) 1913, 1941 Regional № 246 361410306330005 41, Revolution Avenue   Samofalov’s Hotel «Tsentral'naya» (Gostinitsa Samofalova «Tsentral'naya») XIX Regional № 246   44, Revolution Avenue   The building of the hotel «Bristol» (Zdaniye gostinitsy «Bristol'») 1910 Federal № 176 361410056580006 43, Revolution Avenue   Vansovich’ House (Dom Vansovicha) XIX, 1890 Regional № 246 361510405150005 45, Revolution Avenue   Mikhailov’ House (Dom Mikhaylova) XIX, 1890 Regional № 246 361510405090005 47, Revolution Avenue   Samofalov’ House (Dom Samofalova) XIX Regional № 246 361410050200005 46, Revolution Avenue   The house where the writer Shubin lived (Dom, gde pisatel' Shubin zhil) 1880, 1948-1966 Regional № 246 361410136910005 48, Revolution Avenue   The building of the Voronezh Drama Theater (Zdaniye Voronezhskogo dramaticheskogo teatra) XIX Federal № 624     55, Revolution Avenue   Cinema \"Uvechnyy voin\" (Kinematograf \"Uvechnyy voin\") 1916-1917 Regional № 246 361410138820005 56, Revolution Avenue   House trade \"Utyuzhok\" (Dom torgovli \"Utyuzhok\") 1930 Regional № 472 361410138430005 58, Revolution Avenue   Residential House (Dom zhiloj) 1900 Regional № 510 361410142060005 9, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Historian G.M. Veselovsky’s House (Dom istorika G.M. Veselovskogo) 1840 Regional № 510 361510405270005 38, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Homestead (house, outbuilding) (Usad'ba zhilaya (dom, fligel')) 1830 Regional № 219 361520405950005 47, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Putintseva’s Residential House (Zhiloy dom Putintsevoy) XIX Regional № 219 361410143630005 50, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Zakharov's Residential House (Dom zhiloy Zakharova) XIX Regional № 219 361410143780005 53, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Hrschanovichi’s House (Dom Khrshchanovichey) 1911 Regional № 219 361410128410005 58, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Aristov's House (Dom Aristova) XIX Regional № 246 361410143890005 61, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Ryabokonev’s House (Dom Ryabokoneva) 1900 Regional № 219 361510404980005 75, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   House of Cantonists (Dom kantonistov) XIX Regional № 246 361510306480005 76, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   The house where the headquarters of the South-Western Front was located / the hostel of the Theological Seminary (Dom, gde pomeshchalsya shtab Yugo-Zapadnogo fronta / Obshchezhitiye Dukhovnoy seminarii) 1770 - 1883 Regional № 246 361510405920005 80, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Gardenina’s Manor House (Dom usad'by Gardeninoy) XIX - ХХ Regional № 219 361510406080005 86 – 88, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Manor of the Craftmen's Council (Usad'ba Remeslennoy upravy): а) House b) Outhouse (the house where the 1st city committee of Komsomol was located) XIX   1900 Regional   № 510 № 246 361520405130005 361510405130025 361510405130015 87, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   87-а, Sacco and Vanzetti Street     City Police Department (Gorodskoye politseyskoye upravleniye) XIX Regional № 510 361410143970005 93, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Sontsov's Manor (3 buildings) (Usad'ba Sontsova (3 zdaniya)) 1798 Regional № 246   102, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Two-storey residential building with an arch (Dvukhetazhnyy zhiloy dom s arkoy) 1912-1913 Regional № 219   104, Sacco and Vanzetti Street   Paint shop railway workshops (Malyarnyy tsekh zheleznodorozhnykh masterskikh) 1868-ХХ Regional № 246 361510405210005   5, Sverdlov Street , Workshop of the Dzerzhinsky plant     Residential Candle Plant House (Dom zhiloy svechnogo zavoda) 1881 Regional № 472 361410050170005 1, Svechnoy Lane   Public Library named after I.S. Nikitin (Publichnaya biblioteka imeni I.S. Nikitina) XIX Regional № 510 361410059610005 8, Svobody Street   Residential House (Dom zhiloj) XХ Regional № 472 361410146710005 33, Svobody Street   Il'inskaya Church (Il'inskaya tserkov') 1770 Federal № 624   361410147790006 26, Sevast'yanovskiy s\"yezd (Il'inskiy s\"yezd) Street   Ilyinsky Turn (retaining walls and pavement) (Il'inskiy s\"yezd (podpornyye steny i mostovaya)) 1872 Regional № 510 36110059620005 Sevast'yanovskiy s\"yezd (Il'inskiy s\"yezd) Street   Korablinov's House (Dom Korablinova) 1909 Regional № 219 361510405190005 23, Sirenevaya Street   Voischev's Hotel (Zdaniye gostinitsy Voishcheva) ХIХ Regional № 246 391210004670005 10, Sredne-Moskovskaya Street   Hotel \"Grand Hotel\" (Gostinitsa «Grand-Otel») XIX Regional № 219 361510309150005 ул. Средне-Московская, 12   Residential House (Dom zhiloj) XIX-ХХ, 1950 Regional № 510 361510405240005 22 / 24, , Sredne-Moskovskaya Street 26, Nikitinskaya Street   Epifanov's House (Dom Epifanova) 1870 Regional № 510 361510405290005 28, Sredne-Moskovskaya Street   Synagogue (Sinagoga) 1903 Regional № 472 361510406010005 6, Stankevicha Street   Barracks of the Disciplinary Battalion (Kazarmy distsiplinarnogo batal'ona) XVIII, 1909-1910 Regional № 246 361520408670005 27 (54-а), Starykh Bol'shevikov Street   Arsenal Building (Zdaniye Arsenala) XVIII Federal № 1327     43, Stepana Razina Street   Vyakhirev’s Manor (Usad'ba Vyakhireva): а) Residential House of Vyakhirev’s Manor b) Residential House c) Buildings (sluzhebnyye postroyki)     1905   1873 XIX-XX Regional № 472   361420149790005 361410149790035 361410149790015 361410149790025   51, 53, 53а, Stepana Razina Street     Babushkin's House (Dom Babushkina) 1907 Regional № 510 361410137450005 51а, Stepana Razina Street   Sewing Workshop (Shveynaya masterskaya) XIX-ХХ Regional № 472   11/13, Kosti Strelyuka Street   Cadet corps (Kadetskiy korpus) 1840 Regional № 510 361410146790005 3, Studencheskaya Street   Borodin’s House (Dom Borodina) 1908-1909 Regional № 510 361410151810005 18а, Studencheskaya Street   Starodubova and Klyuev's Houses (Doma zhilyye Starodubovoy i Klyuyeva) 1910-1911 Regional № 510 361410147270005 35, Studencheskaya Street   Real School (Real'noye uchilishche) 1877-1879 Regional № 510 361510406550005 36, Studencheskaya Street   Kazanskaya Church (Tserkov' Kazanskaya) 1909 Regional № 246 361510406630005 79, Suvorova Street   Residential House / Meshchansky poorhouse (Dom zhiloj) / Meshchanskaya bogadel'nya XVIII Regional № 472   18, Taranchenko Street   Nikolskaya church and bell tower (Nikol'skaya tserkov' i kolokol'nya) 1712-1720 Federal № 624   361410147310006 19а, Taranchenko Street   Perren-Sinelnikova’s House (Dom Perren-Sinel'nikovoy) 1911 Regional № 472 361410147400005 40, Taranchenko Street   Shtempel'’s House (Dom Shtempelya) 1911 Regional № 472 361410147440005 20, Teatral'naya Street   Residential House (Dom zhiloj) ХХ Regional № 510 361410147470005 22, Teatral'naya Street   Bank 1929-1930 Regional № 472 361410059530005   36, Teatral'naya Street   Forestry Institute Building (Zdaniye lesotekhnicheskogo instituta) 1952 Regional № 219 361410151860005   8, Timiryazeva Street   Hostel Housing (Korpus obshchezhitiya) 1930 Regional № 71-01-07/43   21, Timiryazeva Street   \"Rotunda\" - the ruins of the building of the regional clinical hospital. Place of fierce fighting for the city of Voronezh in 1942-1943. («Rotonda» – ruiny zdaniya oblastnoy klinicheskoy bol'nitsy. Mesto ozhesto-chennykh boyev za gorod Voronezh v 1942-1943). 1942-1943 Regional № 246 361510410990005   Transportnaya Street and Burdenko Street (Street Crossing)     Priest Nigrov’s Residential house (Dom zhiloy svyashchennika Nigrova) 1900 Regional № 510 361510406720005 35, Uritskogo Street   Tikhvino Onufrievskaya Church (Tserkov' Tikhvino-Onufriyevskaya) 1735-1746 Regional № 246   8, Fabrichnyy Lane   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XVIII Regional № 219   10 (10а), Fabrichnyy Lane   Gardenin’s House (Dom Gardenina) 1729-1735 Federal № 1327     12, Fabrichnyy Lane   Gardenin’s House Buildings (Sluzhby doma Gardeninykh) XVIII Regional № 219   14, Fabrichnyy Lane   Powerhouse and Steam Room Cadet Corps Building (Zdaniye elektrostantsii i parovoy prachechnoy kadetskogo korpusa) XIX - ХХ Regional № 472 361410152570005 1, Feoktistova Street   Railway workshops (Zheleznodorozhnyye masterskiye) 1912 Regional № 246 361510407710005 1, Bogdana Khmel'nitskogo Lane   Residential Railway House (Dom zhiloy zheleznoy dorogi) XX Regional № 510 361510406860005 13, Bogdana Khmel'nitskogo Street   Residential Railway House (Dom zhiloy zheleznoy dorogi) XX Regional № 510 361510406850005 15, Bogdana Khmel'nitskogo Street   Hospital Spiritual School (Bol'nitsa Dukhovnogo uchilishcha) 1911 Regional № 510   15, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Petrov’s House (Dom Petrova) 1913-1914 Regional № 246 361510309110005 19, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Somov’s House (Dom Somova) 1913-1914 Regional № 246 361510407550005 21, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Control Chamber (Kontrol'naya palata) ХХ Regional № 510 361410178820005 22, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Morozova’s Gymnasium (Gimnaziya Morozovoy) 1911-1912 Regional № 246 361510214730005 23, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Titov’s House (Dom Titova) 1883 Regional № 510 361410177310005 25, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Nikolayevskaya Progymnasium (Nikolayevskaya progimnaziya) XIX Regional № 246 361510405350005 31, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Merchant Manuylov's House (Dom kuptsa Manuylova) XIX, 1915 Regional № 510 361410176730005 35, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Inns (Postoyalyye dvory): a) Andrianovs’ Inn (left building) b) Goncharov’s Inn (2 central buildings) c) Rastorguev's Inn (right building) 1879 XIX XIX, 1910 Regional № 219   52, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Kashkin’s House, where the poet A. Koltsov visited (Dom Kashkina) XIX Regional № 510   53/А, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Zatekin's Inn (Postoyalyy dvor Zatekina) XIX Regional № 219 391210001360005 54, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Polezhaev's Hotel (Gostinitsa Polezhayeva) XIX Regional № 472 361510407560005 60, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   Red Cross Hospital: house, outhouse (Bol'nitsa Krasnogo Kresta: dom, fligel') XIX, 1894 Regional № 510   72, 72а, Fridrikha Engel'sa Street   The building of the Spasskaya Church (Zdaniye Spasskoy tserkvi) XVIII Regional № 246 361410179510005 16b, Frunze Street   Karmanov’s House (Dom Karmanova) 1899 Regional № 510 361410181500005 23, Frunze Street   Pushkin’s House with bread shop (Dom s khlebnoy lavkoy Pushkina) 1910-1911 Regional № 510 361410182420005 3, Tselinnaya Street   Residential house (Dom zhiloj) XIX - ХХ Regional № 510 361711019040005 11, Tselinnyy Lane   Monument at the site of the battles of the Red Army with the Nazi invaders in 1941-1943 (Pamyatnik na meste boyov Krasnoy Armii s nemetsko-fashistskimi okkupantami v 1941-1943) 1947 Federal № 1327   Central Park of Culture and Rest   Sinitsinsky barracks complex: - Merchant Sakharov’s House - Merchant Sinitsin's House - Sinitsin's Buildings - Barracks (Kompleks Sinitsinskikh kazarm)   XVIII XVIII XVIII 1906 Regional № 246   5, Tsyurupa Street   Siropitatel'nyy House with two buildings (Siropitatel'nyy dom s 2 sluzhbami) XVIII-XIX Regional № 510   11, Tsyurupa Street   Machinskaya’s Houses of Profit (Doma dokhodnyye Machinskoy) 1900 Regional № 510   32, 34, Tsyurupa Street   Water Tower of Romanovskaya Sloboda (Vodonapornaya bashnya Romanovskoy slobody) 1910 Regional № 71-01-07/41 361710909890005   42а, Chapayev Street   House of the editorial board of the journal \"Zheleznyy put'\" (Dom redaktsii zhurnala \"Zheleznyy put'\") 1899 Regional № 246 361410182770005 3, Chaikovsky Street   Administration building of the railway (Administrativnoye zdaniye zheleznoy dorogi) 1870 Regional № 246   2, Chernyakhovsky Square   The house where I.S. Nikitin lived (Dom, v kotorom I.S. Nikitin zhil) XIX Regional № 219 361510410200005 19, Shevchenko Street   A.A. Yakovlev’s manor / manor, where O.E. Mandelstam lived (Usad'ba Yakovleva / usad'ba, gde O.E. Mandel'shtam zhil) 1877 Regional № 472   2, 4, 4а, 4b, Shveynikov Street   Brinkman’s Manor Outhouse (Usadebnyy fligel' Brinkmanov) 1840 Regional № 510   6, Shkol'nyy Lane   Bust A.V. Koltsov (Byust A.V. Kol'tsova) 1868 Federal № 1327   361510206130006 Koltsov Square   Monument V.I. Lenin (Pamyatnik V.I. Leninu) 1950 Federal № 1327   361510206160006 Lenin Square   Monument I.S. Nikitin (Pamyatnik I.S. Nikitinu) 1911 Federal № 1327     Nikitin Square   Monument to Peter I (Pamyatnik Petru I) 1860 – 1956 Federal № 1327   361510202850006 Petrovsky Square   Monument to the Victims of the White Terror in 1919 (Pamyatnik zhertvam belogo terrora v 1919) 1929 Region-al № 246 361510207110005   Plekhanovskaya Street , Square in front of the house 10a     The complex of buildings of the Agricultural Institute named after K.D. Glinka (Kompleks zdaniy Sel'skokhozyaystvennogo instituta imeni K.D. Glinki): Main building (training) Executive building Professorial building Student hostel (Studencheskoye obshchezhitiye) Corps \"Servants\" (Korpus «Sluzhiteley») Powerhouse building (Zdaniye elektrostantsii) Dendrology Park (Dendrologicheskiy park) a) Bath b) Hospital c) Student Dormitory (Hostel) d) School e) Students' hostel with a dining room. 1913-1920   Federal № 624                 № 176                   1, Michurin Street   3, Timiryazev Street   1, Timiryazev Street   11, Timiryazev Street   15, Timiryazev Street   19, Timiryazev Street     17, Timiryazev Street   23, Timiryazev Street   92, Lomonosov Street   96, Lomonosov Street 16, Darvin Street   Mass grave № 15 (Bratskaya mogila) 1943 Regional № 92п 361610568510005 st. Yunnatov   Mass grave № 17 (Bratskaya mogila) 1943 Regional № 92п 361610568490005 Morozov Street   Mass grave № 1 (Bratskaya mogila) 1943 Regional № 92п 361610568520005 20-letiya Oktyabrya Street   Mass grave № 2 (Bratskaya mogila) 1943 Regional № 92п 361610534340005 Moskovskiy prospekt   Trinity Church (Tserkov' Troitsy) XVIII Regional № 510   Borovoye village   Parish school (Shkola prikhodskaya) XIX Regional № 510   Borovoye village, Gagarin Street   Railway Station (Zheleznodorozhnyy vokzal) XIX Regional № 510   Village Krasnolesny, 43а, Oktyabr'skaya Street (Grafskaya station)     Zemstvo Sanatorium (3 buildings) (Sanatoriy zemskiy (3 zdaniya)) ХХ Regional № 510   Village Krasnolesny, 13, Lokhmatikov Street   Spaso-Preobrazhensky Tolshevsky Monastery (Spaso-Preobrazhenskiy Tolshevskiy monastyr'): а) Preobrazheniya Church б) Abbot's corps в) Refectory building г) Cell corpus with the Uspeniya church д) Gate bell tower (basement)         1885 1842 1886 1863 1900 Regional № 510 361520326670005   361510326670035 361510326670055 361510326670025 361510326670045 361510326670015 Village Krasnolesny   Church of the Nativity (Tserkov' Rozhdestva Khristova) 1801 Regional № 510 361510328500005 Malyshevo village   Zemskaya School (Shkola zemskaya) 1914 Regional № 510   Malyshevo village   St. Michael the Archangel’s Church (Tserkov' Mikhaila Arkhangela) 1808 Regional № 510   Repnoye village   Parish school (Shkola prikhodskaya) XX Regional № 510   Repnoye village   Stal'-fon-Gol'steyn’s Manor (Usad'ba Stal'-fon-Gol'steyna): а) Residential House b) Alekseevskaya Church c) Park   XIX 1764 Regional № 510   Repnoye village (pension, home)   Mass grave № 213 (Bratskaya mogila) 1942 Regional № 510 361610568500005 Repnoye village   The bell tower of the Mitrofania’s Church (Kolokol'nya tserkvi Mitrofaniya) 1845 Regional № 510 361510330260005 Shilovo village   The «White Mountain» Fortification (Gorodishche «Belaya gora») VIII – X Federal № 624   361640521940006 Voronezh   Old Slavic Settlement (Drevneslavyanskoye gorodishche) VIII – X Federal № 1327 361640564450006 Voronezh   Kurgan group \"Bald Mountain\" (13 mounds) (Kurgannaya gruppa \"Lysaya gora\" (13 nasypey)) VIII – X Federal № 624   361640521920006 Sanatorium named after M. Gorky   The settlement at the recreation center \"Zarya\" (Poseleniye, «Zarya») II millenni-um BC Federal № 510   Recreation center \"Zarya\"   The parking of ancient people 1 at the village of Borovoye (Stoyanka 1, Borovoye) Neolithic Age Federal № 510   Borovoye village   The settlement near the village of Borovoye (Poseleniye, Borovoye) II millennium BC Federal № 510   Borovoye village   The Settlement of Kaverinskoe (Gorodishche Kaverinskoye) VIII - III centuries BC. Federal № 176    361640513700006 Krasnolesny village   The settlement at the camp «Usmanka» (Poseleniye «Usmanka») II millennium BC Federal № 510   Camp «Usmanka»   Malyshevsky settlement (Malyshevskoye poseleniye) Multi-layered settlement Federal № 510 361640538610006 Malyshevo village   Вurial mound of the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age (Kurgannyy mogil'nik epokhi bronza i rannego zheleznogo veka) II-I millennium BC Federal № 246   Podkletnoe village   Burial mound at the village of Repnoe (4 embankments) (Mogil'nik kurgannyy, Repnoye (4 nasypi)) Multi-layered settlement Federal № 510   Repnoe village   Settlement 1 at Repnoe village (Poseleniye 1, Repnoye) II millennium BC Federal № 510 361640566280006 Repnoe village   Settlement 2 at Repnoe village (Poseleniye 2, Repnoye) II millennium BC Federal № 510 361640566320006 Repnoe village   Settlement 3 at Repnoe village (Poseleniye 3, Repnoye) II millennium BC Federal № 510 361640566340006 Repnoe village   Shilovo settlement 1 (Shilovskoye poseleniye 1) Multi-layered settlement Federal № 510   Shilovo village   Shilovo settlement 2 (Shilovskoye poseleniye 2) Bronze Age Federal № 510   Shilovo village   Shilovo settlement 3 (Shilovskoye poseleniye 3) Early Iron Age Federal № 510   Shilovo village   Ustye settlement (Ust'yenskoye gorodishche) Early Iron Age Federal № 510   Shilovo village In the last years of the XX century, the country's economy began to form a market in the field of historical and cultural heritage, which can be called one of the new economic phenomena. This is evident not only in the demand for something old, but also in many other trends. First of all, it is a significant increase in the value of quotations of real estate and land directly related to the historical centers of cities and historical places in General (and, often, this excess does not correspond directly to the infrastructure of the area of historical development or modern economic development of the historical place). In the late 1990s. occurred the privatization of the first monuments of nature, history and culture, and currently there is a sufficiently active market demand for historical monuments and of the earth with the point of view of their lease and purchase. IV. CONCLUSION Preservation of monuments of natural, historical and cultural heritage plays a special role in promoting the tourist brand of the territory. Because, often, it is the heritage sites or attractions of the region that attract a large number of tourists. Thus, historical and cultural heritage is an important factor in the socio-economic development of individual cities and territories, which can ensure the development of the territory on the basis of the use of a certain resource. For a number of territories, the historical, cultural and natural wealth of the region becomes one of the real opportunities for their economic and social development. REFERENCE LIST Ashmarov, I.A., Ershov, B.A., Bulavin, R.V., Shkarubo, S.N., Danilchenko, S. (2018) The Material And Financial Situation Of The Russian Orthodox Church In The XIX - early XX centuries.  International Multidisciplinary Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies “Far East Con” 2018. Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU). https://www.dvfu.ru/schools/engineering/far_east_con/ (in English). Baudrillard, J. (2000) Symbolic Exchange and Death. 387 p. (in Russ.). Buller, E.A. (1987) Social progress and cultural heritage. 56 p. (in Russ.). Denisov, A. F. (2002) Managerial interaction as a problem of personnel management. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. №. 24. Pp. 71-86. (in Russ.). Egorova, KS (2009) Evaluation of the effectiveness of works on preservation of architectural monuments Bulletin of the TSU. № 4. Pp. 264-270. (in Russ.). Ershov B.A. Ashmarov I.A., (2018) Interaction of the Orthodox Church and the state in Russia at the present stage.. Journal \"Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research\". Number 2, 2018, volume 1, Pp. 19-24. URL: http://bulletensocial.com/index.php/archive.html (in English). Ershov B.A., Ashmarov I.A., Drobyshev A.V., Zhdanova T.A., Buravlev I.A. (2017) Property and Land Relations of Russian Orthodox Church and State in Russia. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences Pp. 324-331. (in Russ.). Ershov, B.A., (2012) Historiographical aspects of the relationship between the Russian Orthodox Church and state structures in the provinces of the Central Chernozem region in the XIX -early XX centuries. Vestnik Voronezh State Technical University. Series \"Humanities\". Pp. 188-192. (in Russ.). Ershov, B.A., (2013) Russian Orthodox Church in the structure of public administration in the XIX - early XX centuries: Monograph \"Voronezh State Technical University. 245 p. (in Russ.). Ershov, B.A., Ashmarov, I.A., Danilchenko, S. (2018) The development of Russian church architecture in the 1990s-2017: the state and prospects. Publisher: DataONE. https://doi.org/10.15146/R3FQ16 (in English). Huseynova, N.M. (1999) Culture in Central and Eastern Europe. Change of values and institutional changes. Culture in the modern world: experience, problems, solutions. Issue 3. RGB. 112 p. (in Russ.). Kagan, B.JI. (2009) Cultural landscape in Russian geography. Culture Observatory: Journal Review. № 1. 114 p. (in Russ.). Kuleshov, M.E. (2007) Legal protection of the Kizhi cultural landscape as a heritage phenomenon. Ecology of Culture Arkhangelsk: Committee on Culture of the Arkhangelsk Region. № 2 (42). Pp. 34-44. (in Russ.). Kuleshova, ME (2007) The heritage and natural-cultural framework of territories. Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. № 1. Pp. 7-14. (in Russ.). Mazin, V.A. (2004) Self-Value of Nature in the Culture of Ob-Ugrians. Publishing house Nizhnevarte. Ped. Inst. 127 p. (in Russ.). Mazurov, Y.L. (1994) Unique territories: a conceptual approach to the identification, protection and use. Unique territories in the cultural and natural heritage of the regions. RNII cultural and natural heritage. 216 p. (in Russ.). Onufrienko, G.F. (1995) Criminal problem number two (organized crime and artistic heritage is a new situation). Landmarks of cultural policy. № 5. 74 p. (in Russ.). Seleznev, E.H. (1994) Problems of cultural and historical heritage in the context of ideas of modernization. Issues of protection and use of historical and cultural monuments: a collection of scientific papers. Pp. 6-16. (in Russ.). Vedenin, Y..A. (1992) The place and role of heritage in the revival of the cultural landscape of Russia. Abstracts of the reports of the second international conference on the preservation and development of unique historical territories. 192 p. (in Russ.). Vernadsky, V.I. (2000) Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon. Works on the philosophy of science. Pp. 316-451. (in Russ.). Vostryakov, L.E. (1996) Regional managerial relations in the field of culture: the search for a new managerial paradigm. 112 p. (in Russ.). Zaitseva, L. (1996) Sources of financing the socio-cultural sphere and the role of industrial patronage. Voprosy Economic  №. 6. (in Russ.). Zakharova, L.N. (2003) Tourism as a sociocultural phenomenon. Tourism as a socio-cultural phenomenon. Publishing house Tyumen. state un-that. Pp. 3-10. (in Russ.).","descriptionType":"Other"}],"geoLocations":[],"fundingReferences":[],"url":"https://dash.ucpress.edu/stash/dataset/doi:10.17916/P6ZW2V","contentUrl":null,"metadataVersion":8,"schemaVersion":null,"source":"mds","isActive":true,"state":"findable","reason":null,"viewCount":100,"downloadCount":4,"referenceCount":0,"citationCount":0,"partCount":0,"partOfCount":0,"versionCount":0,"versionOfCount":0,"created":"2019-04-07T06:52:28Z","registered":"2019-04-07T06:52:29Z","published":null,"updated":"2020-07-29T07:39:06Z"},"relationships":{"client":{"data":{"id":"cdl.cdl","type":"clients"}}}}],"meta":{"total":8,"totalPages":1,"page":1},"links":{"self":"https://api.datacite.org/dois?prefix=10.17916"}}