10.7804/CSES.MODULE4.2015-03-20
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
CSES Module 4 Second Advance Release
CSES Module 4 Second Advance Release
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2011-2016)
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2011-2016)
CSES - Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
2015
KAT15 Political Attitudes and Behavior
McAllister, Ian
Australian National University, Australia
Pietsch, Juliet
Australian National University, Australia
Bean, Clive
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Gibson, Rachel
University of Manchester, United Kingdom
Kritzinger, Sylvia
University of Vienna, Austria
Müller, Wolfgang C.
University of Vienna, Austria
Schönbach, Klaus
University of Vienna, Austria
Sauger, Nicolas
Sciences Po, France
Wessels, Bernhard
WZB (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung), Germany
Rattinger, Hans
University of Mannheim, Germany
Roßteutscher, Sigrid
Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger
University of Mannheim, Germany
Wolf, Christof
GESIS Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany
Chadjipadelis, Theodore
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Andreadis, Ioannis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Hardarson, Olafur P.
University of Iceland, Iceland
Onnudottir, Eva H.
Mannheim University, CDSS, Germany
Marsh, Michael
Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Yasuno, Satoko
Chuo University, Japan
Kobayashi, Tetsuro
National Institute of Informatics, Japan
Inamasu, Kazunori
Kwansei-Gakuin University, Japan
Yamada, Masahiro
Kwansei-Gakuin University, Japan
Ikeda, Ken’ichi
Doshisha University, Japan
Maeda, Yukio
University of Tokyo, Japan
Taniguchi, Naoko
Tokyo Institute of Technologies, Japan
Beltrán, Ulises
Political Studies Division, Mexico
Aguilar, Rosario
Political Studies Division, Mexico
Komar, Olivera
De Facto Consultancy, Montenegro
Gegaj, Pavle
De Facto Consultancy, Montenegro
Bešic, Milo
De Facto Consultancy, Montenegro
Vowles, Jack
Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Grzelak, Paweł
Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
Cześnik, Mikołaj
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland
Markowski, Radosław
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland
Kotnarowski, Michal
Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
Todosijevic, Bojan
Center for Political Studies and Public Opinion Research, Serbia
Pavlovic, Zoran
University of Belgrade, Serbia
Howell, Dave A.
University of Michigan, United States
Ilirjani, Altin
USAID, United States
Lutz, Georg
FORS, Switzerland
Huang, Chi
National Chengchi University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Bureekul, Thawilwadee
King Prajadhipok’s Institute, Thailand
Albitton, Robert B.
University of Mississippi, United States
Sangmahamad, Ratchawadee
King Prajadhipok’s Institute, Thailand
Donakowski, Darrell
University of Michigan, United States
Hutchings, Vincent
University of Michigan, United States
Jackman, Simon
Stanford University, United States
Segura, Gary M.
Stanford University, United States
Australia: Survey Research Centre Pty Ltd, Melbourne
Austria: Jaksch & Partner, Linz
France: TNS-Sofres, Montrouge
Germany: MARPLAN Media- und Sozialforschungsgesellschaft mbH, Frankfurt am Main
Greece: Artistotle University of Thessaloniki Laboratory of Applied Political Research, To The Point Research Consulting Communication S.A., Thessaloniki
Iceland: Social Science Research Institute of the University of Iceland, Reykjavík
Ireland: RED C Research & Marketing Ltd, Dublin
Japan: Nippon Research Center (Member of Gallup International Association), Tokyo
Mexico: CAMPO, S. C., Puebla
Montenegro: De Facto Consultancy, Podgorica
New Zealand: Centre for Methods and Policy Applications in the Social Sciences (COMPASS), University of Auckland, Auckland
Poland: Public Opinion Research Center (Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, CBOS), Warsaw
Serbia: Ipsos Strategic Marketing, Belgrad
Switzerland: DemoSCOPE Research & Marketing, Adligenswil
Taiwan: Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei
Thailand: King Prajadhipok’s Institute, Bangkok
United States: Abt SRBI, New York
2013-09-06
2013-09-06/2014-01-06
2013-10-01
2013-10-01/2013-10-29
2012-05-10
2012-05-10/2012-06-09
2013-09-28
2013-09-28/2013-12-23
2012-10-19
2012-10-19/2013-01-05
2013-05-04
2013-05-04/2013-09-10
2011-03-06
2011-03-06/2011-04-10
2013-07-22
2013-07-22/2013-08-25
2012-07-13
2012-07-13/2012-07-19
2013-02-02
2013-02-02/2013-03-28
2011-11-30
2011-11-30/2012-04-04
2011-10-20
2011-10-20/2011-11-13
2012-12-21
2012-12-21/2013-02-10
2011-10-24
2011-10-24/2011-12-12
2012-01-15
2012-01-15/2012-03-06
2011-07-03
2011-07-03/2011-09-19
2012-11-07
2012-11-07/2013-01-13
deu
ZA5182
10.7804/cses.module4.2014-04-28
2.0.0
Alle im GESIS DBK veröffentlichten Metadaten sind frei verfügbar unter den Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. GESIS bittet jedoch darum, dass Sie alle Metadatenquellen anerkennen und sie nennen, etwa die Datengeber oder jeglichen Aggregator, inklusive GESIS selbst. Für weitere Informationen siehe https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/guidelines.asp?db=d
All metadata from GESIS DBK are available free of restriction under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. However, GESIS requests that you actively acknowledge and give attribution to all metadata sources, such as the data providers and any data aggregators, including GESIS. For further information see https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/guidelines.asp
The module was administered as a post-election interview. The resulting data are provided along with voting, demographic, district and macro variables in a single dataset. CSES Variable List The list of variables is being provided on the CSES Website to help in understanding what content is available from CSES, and to compare the content available in each module. Themes: MICRO-LEVEL DATA: Identification and study administration variables: weighting factors; election type; date of election 1st and 2nd round; study timing (post-election study, pre-election and post-election study, between rounds of majoritarian election); mode of interview; gender of interviewer; date questionnaire administered; primary electoral district of respondent; number of days the interview was conducted after the election; language of questionnaire. Demography: year and month of birth; gender; education; marital status; union membership; union membership of others in household; business association membership, farmers´ association membership; professional association membership; current employment status; main occupation; socio economic status; employment type - public or private; industrial sector; current employment status, occupation, socio economic status, employment type - public or private, and industrial sector of spouse; household income; number of persons in household; number of children in household under the age of 18; number of children in household under the age of 6; attendance at religious services; religiosity; religious denomination; language usually spoken at home; region of residence; race; ethnicity; rural or urban residence; primary electoral district; country of birth; year arrived in current country. Survey variables: perception of public expenditure on health, education, unemployment benefits, defense, old-age pensions, business and industry, police and law enforcement, welfare benefits; perception of improving individual standard of living, state of economy, government’s action on income inequality; respondent cast a ballot at the current and the previous election; vote choice (presidential, lower house and upper house elections) at the current and the previous election; respondent cast candidate preference vote at the current and the previous election; difference who is in power and who people vote for; sympathy scale for selected parties and political leaders; assessment of parties on the left-right-scale and/or an alternative scale; self-assessment on a left-right-scale and an optional scale; satisfaction with democracy; party identification; intensity of party identification, institutional and personal contact in the electoral campaigning, in person, by mail, phone, text message, email or social networks, institutional contact by whom; political information questions; expected development of household income in the next twelve month; ownership of residence, business or property or farm or livestock, stocks or bonds, savings; likelihood to find another job within the next twelve month; spouse likelihood to find another job within the next twelve month. DISTRICT-LEVEL DATA: number of seats contested in electoral district; number of candidates; number of party lists; percent vote of different parties; official voter turnout in electoral district. MACRO-LEVEL DATA: election outcomes by parties in current (lower house/upper house) legislative election; percent of seats in lower house received by parties in current lower house/upper house election; percent of seats in upper house received by parties in current lower house/upper house election; percent of votes received by presidential candidate of parties in current elections; electoral turnout; party of the president and the prime minister before and after the election; number of portfolios held by each party in cabinet, prior to and after the most recent election; size of the cabinet after the most recent election; number of parties participating in election; ideological families of parties; left-right position of parties assigned by experts and alternative dimensions; most salient factors in the election; fairness of the election; formal complaints against national level results; election irregularities reported; scheduled and held date of election; irregularities of election date; extent of election violence and post-election violence; geographic concentration of violence; post-election protest; electoral alliances permitted during the election campaign; existing electoral alliances; requirements for joint party lists; possibility of apparentement and types of apparentement agreements; multi-party endorsements on ballot; votes cast; voting procedure; voting rounds; party lists close, open, or flexible; transferable votes; cumulated votes if more than one can be cast; compulsory voting; party threshold; unit for the threshold; freedom house rating; democracy-autocracy polity IV rating; age of the current regime; regime: type of executive; number of months since last lower house and last presidential election; electoral formula for presidential elections; electoral formula in all electoral tiers (majoritarian, proportional or mixed); for lower and upper houses was coded: number of electoral segments; linked electoral segments; dependent formulae in mixed systems; subtypes of mixed electoral systems; district magnitude (number of members elected from each district); number of secondary and tertiary electoral districts; fused vote; size of the lower house; GDP growth (annual percent); GDP per capita; inflation, GDP Deflator (annual percent); Human development index; total population; total unemployment; TI corruption perception index; international migrant stock and net migration rate; general government final consumption expenditure; public spending on education; health expenditure; military expenditure; central government debt; Gini index; internet users per 100 inhabitants; mobile phone subscriptions per 100 inhabitants; fixed telephone lines per 100 inhabitants; daily newspapers; constitutional federal structure; number of legislative chambers; electoral results data available; effective number of electoral and parliamentary parties.
Individual level: Modes of data collection differ across countries. A standardized questionnaire was administered in face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews or as fixed form self-administered questionnaire. District level: Aggregation of official electoral statistics. Country level: Expert survey using fixed form self-administered questionnaire.
The universe differs across countries. In most countries it includes eligible voters or residents aged 18 or older.
Sampling procedures differ across countries. In most cases multistage stratified cluster sampling or stratified systematic random sampling was used. Detailed information on sampling for most countries is available in the codebook.
Australia
Austria
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Japan
Mexico
Montenegro
New Zealand
Poland
Serbia
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
United States