10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.21258932
Fan Zhang
Fan
Zhang
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Anhui Agricultural University
Conghe Zhang
Conghe
Zhang
Xiuqin Zhao
Xiuqin
Zhao
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Shuangbing Zhu
Shuangbing
Zhu
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Kai Chen
Kai
Chen
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Guixiang Zhou
Guixiang
Zhou
Zhichao Wu
Zhichao
Wu
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Min Li
Min
Li
Anhui Agricultural University
Tianqing Zheng
Tianqing
Zheng
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Wensheng Wang
Wensheng
Wang
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Anhui Agricultural University
Zhi Yan
Zhi
Yan
Qinyong Fei
Qinyong
Fei
Zhikang Li
Zhikang
Li
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Anhui Agricultural University
Jinjie Chen
Jinjie
Chen
Jianlong Xu
Jianlong
Xu
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Additional file 4 of Genomic Architecture of Yield Performance of an Elite Rice Hybrid Revealed by its Derived Recombinant Inbred Line and Their Backcross Hybrid Populations
Additional file 4: Fig. S2. High-density linkage map consisting of 855 bins was constructed for the RIL population from a cross between Q9311B and WSSM based on the genotypes at 13,847 segregating genes. a, The recombination bin map of the RIL population (n = 1061), in which the horizontal axis indicates the RILs and the vertical axis indicates genomic regions. Q9311B/Q9311B homozygous type is shown in red, WSSM/WSSM homozygous type is shown in blue, and Q9311B/WSSM heterozygous type is shown in grey. b, Plots of the Q9311 allele frequency for each bin in the RIL population.
Genetics
figshare
2022
2022-10-02
2023-06-08
Figure
4485456 Bytes
10.5539/ijb.v2n2p222
10.2135/cropsci2010.05.0242
10.1105/tpc.110.076133
10.1007/s11032-010-9427-z
10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00514.x
10.1007/s13258-010-0100-z
10.1007/s13258-011-0223-x
10.1111/pbi.13170
10.1371/journal.pone.0093122
10.1007/s13353-014-0231-z
10.1270/jsbbs.17155
10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.009
10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.005
10.1093/genetics/162.4.1885
10.1073/pnas.0437907100
10.1038/ncomms7258
10.1038/nature19760
10.2134/agronj1926.00021962001800050010x
10.1186/1939-8433-6-4
10.9787/PBB.2017.5.4.371
10.9787/PBB.2019.7.3.272
10.1534/genetics.111.133447
10.15835/nsb519006
10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
10.1093/genetics/145.4.1139
10.1093/genetics/158.4.1737
10.1007/s00122-003-1401-2
10.1534/genetics.108.091942
10.1073/pnas.1610115113
10.1073/pnas.1919086117
10.1111/pbi.13186
10.1017/S0016672312000250
10.1093/nar/gkw1135
10.1007/s00122-003-1192-5
10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.001
10.1093/nar/8.19.4321
10.1016/j.jgg.2022.02.022
10.1086/519795
10.1093/pcp/pcs183
10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.004
10.1111/jipb.13220
10.1038/srep36802
10.1007/s10681-014-1222-1
10.1016/j.cj.2014.06.004
10.1038/s41586-018-0063-9
10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa610
10.2134/agronj2008.0128f
10.1016/j.cj.2016.05.001
10.1270/jsbbs.61.380
10.1186/s12284-021-00539-z
10.1073/pnas.1413750111
10.1073/pnas.94.17.9226
10.1007/s00122-019-03516-9
10.1007/s00122-012-2033-1
10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.006
10.1016/j.molp.2021.02.003
10.1038/s41598-017-06742-7
10.1073/pnas.1214141109
10.1155/2016/2587823
10.1186/s12284-022-00595-z
CC BY