10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.19618955.V1
Rosalie Dostie
Rosalie
Dostie
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Université de Sherbrooke
Isabelle Gaboury
Isabelle
Gaboury
Université de Sherbrooke
Eda Cinar
Eda
Cinar
Chantal Camden
Chantal
Camden
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Université de Sherbrooke
Acceptability of Pediatric Telerehabilitation Interventions Provided by Physical Therapists and Occupational Therapists—A Scoping Review
<p>The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the available literature and identify gaps regarding the acceptability of telerehabilitation interventions provided by pediatric physical therapists and occupational therapists.</p> <p>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) framework to guide this scoping review. We systematically searched eight scholarly databases (CINAHL, Medline, SPORTDiscus, AMED, APA PsychInfo, SCOPUS, PEDro, OTseeker), five gray literature databases (MedlinePlus, Gray Literature Report, OpenGrey, National Institute for Health, ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global [PQDT]), conducted a manual search of selected references and contacted international experts. We included articles published between 2000 and 2021. Acceptability was defined in accordance with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability of Sekhon et al.</p> <p>From a total of 1567 unique references, 123 were deemed eligible for full-text review. Eighteen studies published between 2011 and 2021 were included in this review. Even though every aspect of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was assessed from a variety of angles, a complete appreciation of the concept is still lacking for pediatric telerehabilitation.</p> <p>This review highlights important gaps in our knowledge regarding the acceptability of pediatric telerehabilitation interventions and supports the need for further research focusing on the subject.</p>
Medicine
Sociology
69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Science Policy
111714 Mental Health
Taylor & Francis
2022
2022-04-20
2023-03-27
Journal contribution
14095 Bytes
10.1080/01942638.2022.2064203
10.6084/m9.figshare.19618955
CC BY 4.0