10.5281/ZENODO.3820281
Smanio Ivan
0000-0001-6424-4440
Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 12 kwietnia 2018 r., II KK 411/17 (podmiot przestępstwa z art. 300 § 2 k.k.)
Zenodo
2019
crimes against business transactions, obstruction of the satisfaction of creditor's claims, action pauliana, joint perpetration, individualization of responsibility
2019-03-31
pl
Journal article
https://zenodo.org/record/3820281
1506-1817
10.5281/zenodo.3820280
https://www.czpk.pl/index.php/zeszyty-archiwum/zeszyt-2019-1
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Open Access
<p>The author of the commentary critically refers to the thesis of the Supreme Court that criminally liable on the basis of Article 300 § 2 of the Polish Criminal Code (k.k.) is not only a personal debtor but also a person liable to the creditor materially (material debtor). Referring to the second thesis of the Supreme Court, the author of the commentary indicates that a third party within the meaning of Article 527 of the Polish Civil Code (k.c.) due to the lack of a contractual tie with the creditor cannot be classifi ed as a “debtor” for the purposes of Article 300 § 2 k.k. In the author’s opinion, the extraneus fi gure is an alternative way for assigning to a third party within the meaning of Article 527 k.c. the criminal liability for an off ense under Article 300 § 2 k.k. without the need to extend the term “debtor” as was done in the commented judgment.</p>
{"references": ["https://www.czpk.pl/index.php/zeszyty-archiwum/zeszyt-2019-1"]}