10.5061/DRYAD.F65H2
Ceradini, Joseph P.
University of Wyoming
Chalfoun, Anna D.
University of Wyoming
Data from: When perception reflects reality: non-native grass invasion
alters small mammal risk landscapes and survival
Dryad
dataset
2018
2018-01-13T00:00:00Z
2018-01-13T00:00:00Z
en
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2785
290254 bytes
1
CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication
1. Modification of habitat structure due to invasive plants can alter the
risk landscape for wildlife by, for example, changing the quality or
availability of refuge habitat. Whether perceived risk corresponds with
actual fitness outcomes, however, remains an important open question. We
simultaneously measured how habitat changes due to a common invasive grass
(cheatgrass, Bromus tectorum) affected the perceived risk, habitat
selection, and apparent survival of a small mammal, enabling us to assess
how well perceived risk influenced important behaviors and reflected
actual risk. 2. We measured perceived risk by nocturnal rodents using a
giving-up density foraging experiment with paired shrub (safe) and open
(risky) foraging trays in cheatgrass and native habitats. We also
evaluated microhabitat selection across a cheatgrass gradient as an
additional assay of perceived risk and behavioral responses for deer mice
(Peromyscus maniculatus) at two spatial scales of habitat availability.
Finally, we used mark-recapture analysis to quantify deer mouse apparent
survival across a cheatgrass gradient while accounting for detection
probability and other habitat features. 3. In the foraging experiment,
shrubs were more important as protective cover in cheatgrass dominated
habitats, suggesting that cheatgrass increased perceived predation risk.
Additionally, deer mice avoided cheatgrass and selected shrubs, and
marginally avoided native grass, at two spatial scales. 4. Deer mouse
apparent survival varied with a cheatgrass-shrub interaction,
corresponding with our foraging experiment results, and providing a rare
example of a native plant mediating the effects of an invasive plant on
wildlife. 5. By synthesizing the results of three individual lines of
evidence (foraging behavior, habitat selection, and apparent survival), we
provide a rare example of linkage between behavioral responses of animals
indicative of perceived predation risk and actual fitness outcomes.
Moreover, our results suggest that exotic grass invasions can influence
wildlife populations by altering risk landscapes and survival.
PEMA_MarkRecap_SurvivalMark-recapture data used to estimate deer mouse
apparent survival using a Huggins robust design model. The file is a tab
delimited text file. The data are set up to be analyzed in RMark (R
interface for program MARK). The capture histories have 2 dummy occasions,
9 and 10, that were necessary for processing the data as robust design
with RMark. Those occasions, and the dummy survival interval, were all
fixed to zero so they did not affect estimates. Please contact
joeceradini@gmail.com for additional details.GUD_foraging_dataGUD foraging
data. File is a comma delimited csv. Response variable is
"diff.gud", which is described in the article. Contact
joeceradini@gmail.com for additional
details.PEMA_HabitatSelection_dataUsed-available data for deer mouse
habitat selection analysis at two spatial scales. Response variable is
"used", strata = TrackID and cluster = site. Data were analyzed
with the clogit function in the survival package in R. Please contact
joeceradini@gmail.com for additional details on covariate columns, such as
which apply to which spatial scale.